Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Elim Park Baptist Home, Inc

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Connecticut (CT)
  4. Cheshire
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Elim Park Baptist Home, Inc

General Information

Legal Business NameElim Park Baptist Home, Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 20, 1976 (41 years)
Capacity90
Residents87
Percent Occupied97%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Elim Park Baptist Home, Inc

Elim Park Baptist Home, Inc
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Connecticut Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 27, 2015 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive notice to the resident before a room or roommate change.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

August 25, 2015 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionOther fire safety features required by fire safety codes.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly protected cooking facilities.

July 17, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

July 15, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly maintained smoke detectors.
DFewPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly protected cooking facilities.

September 12, 2013 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$1,495 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Elim Park Baptist Home, Inc require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 20min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 45min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
98.4%
98.4%
94.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
96.5%
96.3%
95.0%
94.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
-
-
-
43.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Low Risk Residents Who Lose Control of Their Bowel or Bladder
14.3%
9.4%
5.1%
18.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Received an Antipsychotic Medication
7.4%
13.7%
12.3%
16.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Need for Help with ADLs has Increased
1.9%
11.5%
12.7%
6.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
8.8%
9.4%
13.3%
7.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Lose Too Much Weight
0.0%
1.9%
1.7%
4.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
High Risk Residents With Pressure Ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
2.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Have Depressive Symptoms
5.3%
7.5%
5.0%
3.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
With a Urinary Tract Infection
5.3%
9.3%
3.3%
3.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury
3.1%
1.9%
1.5%
2.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
With a Catheter Inserted and Left in Their Bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Were Physically Restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

94.9%
91.2%
88.9%
81.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
87.4%
86.3%
86.3%
81.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Were Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
22.0%
27.5%
28.8%
17.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
6.5%
7.1%
3.7%
1.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Newly Received an Antipsychotic Medication
1.3%
1.5%
1.7%
0.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
With Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened