Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Meadow Ridge

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Connecticut (CT)
  4. West Redding
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Meadow Ridge

General Information

Legal Business NameRedding Life Care LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 26, 2002 (14 years)
Capacity59
Residents50
Percent Occupied85%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Meadow Ridge

Meadow Ridge
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
* Data not availableStaff Rating
* Data not availableRN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Connecticut Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 24, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.

February 19, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionExits that are accessible at all times.
DFewPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionWalls that prevent smoke from passing through and would resist fire for at least one hour.

April 10, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

April 8, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionOther fire safety features required by fire safety codes.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionHeating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionAutomatic sprinkler systems that have been maintained in working order.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly maintained smoke detectors.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Staffing Values not Reported because of Data Quality Concerns

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
97.7%
97.7%
94.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
97.6%
94.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
-
-
-
43.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Low Risk Residents Who Lose Control of Their Bowel or Bladder
22.0%
22.0%
17.1%
18.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Received an Antipsychotic Medication
-
0.0%
14.7%
16.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Need for Help with ADLs has Increased
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
2.6%
7.5%
7.5%
7.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Lose Too Much Weight
11.8%
-
3.3%
4.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
High Risk Residents With Pressure Ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Have Depressive Symptoms
2.6%
0.0%
2.5%
3.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
With a Urinary Tract Infection
4.9%
0.0%
2.4%
3.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury
0.0%
2.4%
0.0%
2.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
With a Catheter Inserted and Left in Their Bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Were Physically Restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.9%
98.9%
95.8%
81.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
89.4%
88.4%
88.4%
81.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Were Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
4.9%
2.2%
4.3%
17.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
1.3%
1.2%
0.0%
1.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
Newly Received an Antipsychotic Medication
0.7%
1.0%
2.2%
0.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015CT
With Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened