Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Friendship Village-Schaumburg

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Illinois (IL)
  4. Schaumburg
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Friendship Village-Schaumburg

General Information

Legal Business NameEvangelical Retirement Homes Of Greater Chicago, Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Other
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 31, 1978 (39 years)
Capacity250
Residents219
Percent Occupied88%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Friendship Village-Schaumburg

Friendship Village-Schaumburg
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Illinois Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 11, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionWeekly inspections and monthly testing of generators.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionPortable fire extinguishers.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly installed electrical wiring and equipment.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionAutomatic sprinkler systems that have been maintained in working order.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionAn approved automatic sprinkler system connected to the fire alarm system.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionCorridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionWalls that prevent smoke from passing through and would resist fire for at least one hour.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionSpecial areas constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or an approved fire extinguishing system.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly maintained smoke detectors.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionA two-hour-resistant firewall separation.

January 21, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionA fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionA written emergency evacuation plan.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionA two-hour-resistant firewall separation.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionAutomatic sprinkler systems that have been maintained in working order.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionNo-smoking signs where oxygen is used.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly maintained smoke detectors.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionExits that are accessible at all times.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionCorridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionWalls that prevent smoke from passing through and would resist fire for at least one hour.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionSpecial areas constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or an approved fire extinguishing system.

January 15, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep clinical record information safe.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Friendship Village-Schaumburg require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 50min
ReportedExpected
CNA
15min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 5min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 45min
4hr 35min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.2%
97.3%
97.3%
93.4%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
95.2%
97.5%
96.3%
92.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
69.7%
69.9%
72.2%
39.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
Low Risk Residents Who Lose Control of Their Bowel or Bladder
21.0%
13.6%
11.1%
22.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
Received an Antipsychotic Medication
2.8%
8.4%
7.5%
15.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
Need for Help with ADLs has Increased
1.2%
1.7%
2.4%
6.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
2.6%
4.1%
6.0%
8.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
Lose Too Much Weight
3.0%
2.0%
1.3%
6.4%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
High Risk Residents With Pressure Ulcers
10.4%
10.1%
11.3%
15.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
Have Depressive Symptoms
3.0%
4.5%
1.9%
4.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
With a Urinary Tract Infection
3.0%
3.7%
3.7%
3.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury
2.0%
1.4%
1.9%
3.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
With a Catheter Inserted and Left in Their Bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
Were Physically Restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

71.1%
77.7%
76.7%
78.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
78.3%
72.9%
72.9%
77.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
Were Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
7.4%
7.0%
3.0%
15.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
1.4%
2.7%
1.0%
2.4%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
Newly Received an Antipsychotic Medication
0.2%
0.3%
0.3%
1.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015IL
With Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened