Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Hancock Park Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Massachusetts (MA)
  4. Quincy
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Hancock Park Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

General Information

Legal Business NameHancock Park Limited Partnership
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 13, 1996 (20 years)
Capacity142
Residents135
Percent Occupied95%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Hancock Park Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

Hancock Park Rehabilitation & Nursing Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Massachusetts Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 29, 2015 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmFire Safety InspectionAutomatic sprinkler systems that have been maintained in working order.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmFire Safety InspectionApproved construction type or materials.

October 21, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmFire Safety InspectionWeekly inspections and monthly testing of generators.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmFire Safety InspectionHeating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmFire Safety InspectionAn approved automatic sprinkler system connected to the fire alarm system.

September 18, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$1,625 fine
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Hancock Park Rehabilitation & Nursing Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 40min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 15min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 35min
3hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
55.6%
49.1%
52.4%
52.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
Low Risk Residents Who Lose Control of Their Bowel or Bladder
17.4%
19.8%
20.2%
19.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
Received an Antipsychotic Medication
12.1%
11.6%
7.9%
15.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
Need for Help with ADLs has Increased
4.7%
3.3%
7.6%
5.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
7.5%
7.8%
11.4%
6.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
Lose Too Much Weight
0.0%
6.0%
1.5%
4.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
High Risk Residents With Pressure Ulcers
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
3.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
Have Depressive Symptoms
5.6%
4.9%
6.5%
4.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
With a Urinary Tract Infection
5.5%
4.7%
4.6%
3.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury
1.0%
0.0%
1.9%
2.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
With a Catheter Inserted and Left in Their Bladder
0.9%
0.9%
0.9%
1.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
Were Physically Restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.7%
99.1%
99.7%
82.4%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
99.0%
97.8%
97.8%
85.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
Were Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
32.2%
36.8%
38.7%
17.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
0.6%
0.0%
1.4%
1.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
Newly Received an Antipsychotic Medication
0.6%
0.5%
0.0%
1.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MA
With Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened