Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

St Ottos Care Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Minnesota (MN)
  4. Little Falls
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About St Ottos Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameKaska Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 1, 1983 (34 years)
Capacity93
Residents84
Percent Occupied90%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for St Ottos Care Center

St Ottos Care Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Minnesota Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 30, 2015 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionRestrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmFire Safety InspectionProper medical gas storage and administration areas.
DFewPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionCorridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

July 10, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined safe.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of St Ottos Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 50min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
97.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
43.8%
47.5%
65.9%
48.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
Low Risk Residents Who Lose Control of Their Bowel or Bladder
14.1%
10.7%
13.9%
13.4%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
Received an Antipsychotic Medication
21.7%
13.5%
12.5%
14.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
Need for Help with ADLs has Increased
4.8%
4.4%
10.0%
11.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
12.2%
6.4%
0.0%
7.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
Lose Too Much Weight
12.5%
5.4%
11.5%
4.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
High Risk Residents With Pressure Ulcers
9.2%
2.6%
5.7%
5.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
Have Depressive Symptoms
6.8%
5.1%
8.0%
4.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
With a Urinary Tract Infection
1.2%
2.5%
2.6%
4.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury
6.5%
6.5%
3.3%
3.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
With a Catheter Inserted and Left in Their Bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
Were Physically Restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.2%
97.8%
97.1%
83.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
98.0%
94.1%
94.1%
82.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
Were Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
24.0%
36.0%
38.3%
22.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
0.0%
3.0%
2.3%
1.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
Newly Received an Antipsychotic Medication
1.3%
4.9%
7.0%
1.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015MN
With Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened