Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Huntersville Oaks

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. North Carolina (NC)
  4. Huntersville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Huntersville Oaks

General Information

Legal Business NameHuntersville Oaks
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 1, 1973 (43 years)
Capacity168
Residents158
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Huntersville Oaks

Huntersville Oaks
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of North Carolina Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 8, 2015 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionSigns that state that exit doors are to be kept closed.

June 19, 2015 - 18 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
GFewActual HarmComplaintGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.

September 16, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly installed electrical wiring and equipment.
DFewPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionRecord of quarterly fire drills for each shift under varying conditions.

August 28, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Huntersville Oaks require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
60min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 10min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

85.7%
85.3%
85.3%
93.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
81.7%
80.8%
84.5%
92.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
63.2%
69.6%
78.0%
54.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
Low Risk Residents Who Lose Control of Their Bowel or Bladder
9.8%
11.1%
12.0%
14.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
Received an Antipsychotic Medication
21.2%
15.2%
24.4%
18.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
Need for Help with ADLs has Increased
8.9%
13.6%
12.6%
9.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
7.0%
7.3%
6.8%
8.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
Lose Too Much Weight
5.9%
5.3%
4.7%
7.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
High Risk Residents With Pressure Ulcers
2.6%
0.9%
0.0%
3.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
Have Depressive Symptoms
2.4%
2.5%
11.7%
5.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
With a Urinary Tract Infection
4.0%
1.7%
2.7%
3.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury
3.1%
10.2%
8.9%
2.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
With a Catheter Inserted and Left in Their Bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
Were Physically Restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

65.0%
63.2%
73.4%
82.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
68.2%
67.0%
67.0%
82.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
Were Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
27.4%
20.9%
22.5%
18.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
1.2%
0.0%
1.0%
2.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
Newly Received an Antipsychotic Medication
0.4%
0.9%
0.7%
1.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NC
With Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened