Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Quality Living, Inc

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Nebraska (NE)
  4. Omaha
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Quality Living, Inc

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 25, 1990 (27 years)
Capacity114
Residents114
Percent Occupied100%
Program ParticipationMedicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Quality Living, Inc

Quality Living, Inc
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
* Data not availableStaff Rating
* Data not availableRN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Nebraska Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 23, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProper backup exit lighting.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionAutomatic sprinkler systems that have been maintained in working order.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionRestrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionResident room doors of proper design and width.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionApproved construction type or materials.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionCorridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionWalls that prevent smoke from passing through and would resist fire for at least one hour.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionSmoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly installed electrical wiring and equipment.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionSpecial areas constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or an approved fire extinguishing system.

August 20, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Staffing Values not Reported because of Data Quality Concerns

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

93.0%
92.7%
92.7%
96.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
98.8%
94.8%
94.5%
93.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
8.8%
11.6%
9.8%
46.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Low Risk Residents Who Lose Control of Their Bowel or Bladder
19.0%
21.9%
19.3%
20.4%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Received an Antipsychotic Medication
0.0%
5.3%
2.9%
15.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Need for Help with ADLs has Increased
3.8%
4.6%
2.8%
11.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
0.0%
4.2%
5.6%
7.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Lose Too Much Weight
0.0%
2.0%
0.0%
4.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
High Risk Residents With Pressure Ulcers
1.2%
5.3%
7.8%
6.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Have Depressive Symptoms
7.1%
4.1%
3.3%
6.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
With a Urinary Tract Infection
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury
5.4%
12.3%
7.9%
4.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
With a Catheter Inserted and Left in Their Bladder
11.6%
12.4%
13.2%
0.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Were Physically Restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

91.8%
84.7%
70.4%
80.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
96.5%
90.2%
90.2%
81.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Were Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
19.6%
15.4%
17.2%
20.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
7.1%
5.6%
8.9%
2.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Newly Received an Antipsychotic Medication
0.0%
3.2%
0.0%
1.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
With Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened