Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Good Samaritan Society - Wood River

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Nebraska (NE)
  4. Wood River
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Good Samaritan Society - Wood River

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 1, 1996 (20 years)
Capacity61
Residents53
Percent Occupied87%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Good Samaritan Society - Wood River

Good Samaritan Society - Wood River
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Nebraska Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 1, 2015 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.

January 12, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionExits that are accessible at all times.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionSpecial areas constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or an approved fire extinguishing system.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionSmoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionWalls that prevent smoke from passing through and would resist fire for at least one hour.

December 23, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave enough nurses to care for every resident in a way that maximizes the resident's well being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Good Samaritan Society - Wood River require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
20min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
45min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 35min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
98.3%
98.3%
96.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
98.0%
98.1%
98.1%
93.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
-
-
-
46.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Low Risk Residents Who Lose Control of Their Bowel or Bladder
31.2%
35.3%
38.0%
20.4%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Received an Antipsychotic Medication
14.3%
6.5%
10.9%
15.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Need for Help with ADLs has Increased
-
-
-
11.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
9.8%
7.4%
7.8%
7.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Lose Too Much Weight
2.3%
6.7%
2.3%
4.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
High Risk Residents With Pressure Ulcers
5.9%
1.9%
0.0%
6.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Have Depressive Symptoms
0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
6.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
With a Urinary Tract Infection
3.9%
7.4%
0.0%
4.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury
8.9%
3.8%
0.0%
4.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
With a Catheter Inserted and Left in Their Bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
Were Physically Restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
-
75.0%
80.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
-
-
-
81.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Were Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
-
-
-
20.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
-
-
-
2.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Newly Received an Antipsychotic Medication
-
-
9.7%
1.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015NE
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
With Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened