Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Cedar Village

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Ohio (OH)
  4. Mason
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Cedar Village

General Information

Legal Business NameJewish Home Of Cincinnati, Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 1, 1997 (20 years)
Capacity162
Residents147
Percent Occupied91%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Cedar Village

Cedar Village
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Ohio Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 22, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProper medical gas storage and administration areas.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionAn approved automatic sprinkler system connected to the fire alarm system.

January 16, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionWeekly inspections and monthly testing of generators.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly maintained smoke detectors.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionEmergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionWalls that prevent smoke from passing through and would resist fire for at least one hour.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionAutomatic sprinkler systems that have been maintained in working order.
DFewPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionSmoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Cedar Village require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 10min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.0%
99.1%
99.1%
95.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
80.6%
48.6%
48.1%
95.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
60.5%
50.0%
51.5%
41.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
Low Risk Residents Who Lose Control of Their Bowel or Bladder
26.5%
21.0%
23.5%
20.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
Received an Antipsychotic Medication
15.3%
12.2%
16.5%
15.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
Need for Help with ADLs has Increased
11.9%
6.8%
3.3%
8.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
5.8%
12.8%
9.6%
7.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
Lose Too Much Weight
5.6%
4.6%
2.4%
5.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
High Risk Residents With Pressure Ulcers
2.0%
1.0%
7.2%
12.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
Have Depressive Symptoms
5.8%
0.9%
2.9%
5.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
With a Urinary Tract Infection
2.9%
6.3%
5.8%
3.4%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury
3.8%
3.6%
3.7%
3.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
With a Catheter Inserted and Left in Their Bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
Were Physically Restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

80.5%
81.8%
85.9%
86.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
88.3%
87.0%
87.0%
84.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
Were Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
24.8%
26.7%
29.9%
20.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
2.0%
1.0%
0.5%
2.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
Newly Received an Antipsychotic Medication
1.0%
2.1%
1.6%
1.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015OH
With Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened