Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Abramson Residence

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Pennsylvania (PA)
  4. North Wales
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Abramson Residence

General Information

Legal Business NameMadlyn And Leonard Abramson Center For Jewish Life
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 19, 2001 (15 years)
Capacity324
Residents321
Percent Occupied99%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Abramson Residence

Abramson Residence
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 12, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionAutomatic sprinkler systems that have been maintained in working order.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionWalls that prevent smoke from passing through and would resist fire for at least one hour.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly installed electrical wiring and equipment.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProtected exits that allow the resident to escape the building.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionA two-hour-resistant firewall separation.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionSmoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProper stairway enclosures and vertical shafts.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionHeating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionCorridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmFire Safety InspectionWeekly inspections and monthly testing of generators.
DFewPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionSpecial areas constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or an approved fire extinguishing system.
DFewPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionCorridors that are separated from use areas by walls constructed to limit the passage of smoke.
DFewPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionExit stairways and towers that are smoke proof.

May 1, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

July 14, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionAutomatic sprinkler systems that have been maintained in working order.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionHeating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionSmoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionWalls that prevent smoke from passing through and would resist fire for at least one hour.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionCorridors that are separated from use areas by walls constructed to limit the passage of smoke.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionCorridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
DFewPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly installed electrical wiring and equipment.
DFewPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionA two-hour-resistant firewall separation.

July 1, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Abramson Residence require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 10min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
99.6%
100.0%
99.6%
94.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
68.8%
61.3%
65.2%
56.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
Low Risk Residents Who Lose Control of Their Bowel or Bladder
13.8%
12.6%
11.0%
16.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
Received an Antipsychotic Medication
19.3%
11.6%
7.8%
15.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
Need for Help with ADLs has Increased
2.3%
3.7%
3.6%
8.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
5.6%
6.7%
8.0%
7.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
Lose Too Much Weight
6.7%
12.4%
9.4%
5.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
High Risk Residents With Pressure Ulcers
2.3%
1.9%
1.1%
3.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
Have Depressive Symptoms
1.1%
2.2%
1.1%
4.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
With a Urinary Tract Infection
3.7%
3.7%
3.3%
3.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury
1.4%
2.6%
2.0%
3.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
With a Catheter Inserted and Left in Their Bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
Were Physically Restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.1%
97.2%
97.8%
82.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
96.6%
96.5%
96.5%
83.4%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
Were Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
0.6%
1.2%
0.6%
18.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
1.2%
3.0%
2.9%
2.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
Newly Received an Antipsychotic Medication
1.1%
2.5%
1.8%
1.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015PA
With Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened