Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Signature Pointe On The Lake Healthcare Community

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Dallas
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Signature Pointe On The Lake Healthcare Community

General Information

Legal Business NameLcs Sp LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 26, 1998 (18 years)
Capacity100
Residents100
Percent Occupied100%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Signature Pointe On The Lake Healthcare Community

Signature Pointe On The Lake Healthcare Community
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
* Data not availableStaff Rating
* Data not availableRN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 26, 2015 - 18 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionCorridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly installed electrical wiring and equipment.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProper stairway enclosures and vertical shafts.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly protected cooking facilities.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionSmoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionSigns that state that exit doors are to be kept closed.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionWalls that prevent smoke from passing through and would resist fire for at least one hour.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionA fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.

June 26, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly protected cooking facilities.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionAutomatic sprinkler systems that have been maintained in working order.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly working alarms on sprinkler valves.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionApproved construction type or materials.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionCorridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
DFewPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly maintained smoke detectors.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Staffing Values not Reported because of Data Quality Concerns

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

63.8%
55.7%
55.7%
90.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
87.5%
83.9%
75.5%
87.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
-
-
-
46.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Low Risk Residents Who Lose Control of Their Bowel or Bladder
23.2%
25.0%
12.2%
22.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Received an Antipsychotic Medication
15.6%
16.3%
13.5%
19.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Need for Help with ADLs has Increased
-
-
-
8.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
1.8%
3.7%
6.1%
6.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Lose Too Much Weight
5.7%
3.8%
4.3%
6.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
High Risk Residents With Pressure Ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Have Depressive Symptoms
5.5%
5.6%
8.2%
5.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
With a Urinary Tract Infection
1.8%
1.8%
4.1%
3.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury
8.2%
5.5%
4.1%
3.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
With a Catheter Inserted and Left in Their Bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Were Physically Restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

74.8%
66.4%
65.2%
71.4%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
72.5%
67.2%
67.2%
71.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Were Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
7.5%
9.6%
14.7%
16.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
0.9%
0.4%
1.3%
3.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Newly Received an Antipsychotic Medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
1.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
With Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened