Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Renaissance At Kessler Park

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Dallas
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About The Renaissance At Kessler Park

General Information

Legal Business NameRenaissance Snf LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 1, 1992 (25 years)
Capacity105
Residents106
Percent OccupiedUnknown
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Renaissance At Kessler Park

The Renaissance At Kessler Park
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 31, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$1,625 fine
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 3 days
---Fine$1,625 fine
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint+Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

January 15, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly protected cooking facilities.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionExits that are free from obstructions and can be used at all times.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionPortable fire extinguishers.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionEmergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionExits that are accessible at all times.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionWalls that prevent smoke from passing through and would resist fire for at least one hour.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionCorridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionAn approved automatic sprinkler system connected to the fire alarm system.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
DFewPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionApproved construction type or materials.

January 24, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.

January 23, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly protected cooking facilities.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionWeekly inspections and monthly testing of generators.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionAn approved automatic sprinkler system connected to the fire alarm system.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionAn approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionCorridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionSmoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmFire Safety InspectionRecord of quarterly fire drills for each shift under varying conditions.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmFire Safety InspectionProperly maintained smoke detectors.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Renaissance At Kessler Park require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 10min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
15min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 25min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

72.1%
67.2%
67.2%
90.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
90.4%
89.0%
80.2%
87.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
44.8%
40.9%
44.2%
46.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Low Risk Residents Who Lose Control of Their Bowel or Bladder
38.8%
34.2%
38.5%
22.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Received an Antipsychotic Medication
18.5%
30.8%
23.0%
19.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Need for Help with ADLs has Increased
14.9%
10.6%
6.9%
8.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
4.9%
4.0%
9.4%
6.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Lose Too Much Weight
3.2%
8.3%
7.5%
6.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
High Risk Residents With Pressure Ulcers
3.4%
2.2%
3.4%
6.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Have Depressive Symptoms
2.9%
1.0%
2.1%
5.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
With a Urinary Tract Infection
1.9%
4.0%
4.2%
3.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury
1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
3.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
With a Catheter Inserted and Left in Their Bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Were Physically Restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

61.5%
63.0%
50.0%
71.4%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
71.8%
71.8%
71.8%
71.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Were Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
-
-
25.9%
16.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
0.0%
4.2%
5.7%
3.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Newly Received an Antipsychotic Medication
3.3%
0.0%
2.1%
1.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
With Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened