Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Harlingen
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen

General Information

Legal Business NameSsc Harlingen Operating Company LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 12, 1989 (27 years)
Capacity129
Residents129
Percent Occupied100%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen

Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 2, 2015 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

December 17, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.

December 4, 2014 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

December 11, 2013 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionAutomatic sprinkler systems that have been maintained in working order.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
ESomePotential for HarmFire Safety InspectionA fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmFire Safety InspectionAn externally vented heating system.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Retama Manor Nursing Center/Harlingen require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 50min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

40.2%
38.5%
38.5%
90.7%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
42.3%
41.5%
41.7%
87.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
68.6%
55.9%
57.6%
46.9%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Low Risk Residents Who Lose Control of Their Bowel or Bladder
29.8%
20.7%
15.8%
22.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Received an Antipsychotic Medication
23.8%
25.6%
13.2%
19.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Need for Help with ADLs has Increased
5.1%
18.3%
19.4%
8.8%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
3.1%
2.1%
6.3%
6.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Lose Too Much Weight
10.0%
5.1%
8.9%
6.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
High Risk Residents With Pressure Ulcers
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
6.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Have Depressive Symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
With a Urinary Tract Infection
2.1%
2.1%
2.1%
3.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury
3.5%
2.7%
4.2%
3.3%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
With a Catheter Inserted and Left in Their Bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Were Physically Restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

53.9%
49.7%
48.7%
71.4%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine
56.6%
50.3%
50.3%
71.1%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Were Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine
25.1%
30.9%
35.4%
16.5%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Self Report Moderate to Severe Pain
2.5%
2.7%
2.9%
3.2%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
Newly Received an Antipsychotic Medication
1.3%
2.3%
2.0%
1.0%
Q1 2015Q2 2015Q3 2015TX
With Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened