Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Shelby Ridge Nursing Home

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Alabama (AL)
  4. Alabaster
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    I was there for 5 weeks.The therapy was able to take me from not being able to stand on my own to walking 90 feet with a walker.They taught me to care for myself and shape up my upper body.Lesley and Stephaney were the beautiful people I worked with.I think of them as family.They gave me another chance. The nurses and CA's were great and made every effort to do a very difficult job.They do a lot of work with much undo criticism. I am very pleased with many people there Katina,Massamino,Shirley,Veronica,and many more.Thanks all,Sal Rossi

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I was in there after 5 weeks in the hospital, and this the worst excuse for a rehab facility. It's primarily a nursing home with therapy. I arrived on Tuesday afternoon and therapy didn't start until Thursday. I requested transfer to another facility Thursday morning and the discharge person pussyfoot around for 4 hours before faxing my info to the next facility. The food is very unhealthy, a bunch of nasty fried foods. And as another person wrote, the Nighshift is horrible. My roommate would call out for someone because she couldn't see to use the call button and they would never reply. They definitely do not deserve the ONE star I gave, but you have to select one to write a review!

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    If I could I would give them a -5 stars, they almost let my father slip into a diabetic coma because they are horrible at patient care. I would never send my worst enemy to this facility!!

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    My mother has been in this facility since December 2016 and the staff has been awesome and wonderful.

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Staff (CNA) very rude not friendly at all i wouldn't send my pet there....

About Shelby Ridge Nursing Home

General Information

Legal Business NameShelby Ridge Acquisition Corporation
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 10, 1991 (27 years)
Capacity131
Residents123
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Shelby Ridge Nursing Home

Shelby Ridge Nursing Home
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Alabama Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 29, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Shelby Ridge Nursing Home require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 5min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 35min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
60min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 40min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.9%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
98.9%
96.9%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
7.1%
5.6%
20.5%
22.0%
41.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
39.0%
35.6%
38.5%
39.3%
29.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
24.2%
20.9%
22.4%
10.3%
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.7%
14.7%
15.6%
16.7%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.6%
12.2%
21.4%
6.2%
12.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.1%
2.1%
1.1%
5.2%
7.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.6%
0.0%
8.6%
3.3%
5.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1%
6.3%
8.9%
5.2%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%
3.2%
1.1%
0.0%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7%
4.1%
6.0%
2.7%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

94.5%
96.1%
98.1%
97.3%
82.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
80.2%
90.3%
90.3%
90.3%
79.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
65.0%
62.3%
62.8%
65.6%
55.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
1.2%
1.1%
0.5%
0.0%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.2%
1.2%
1.9%
3.3%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places