Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Shelby Ridge Nursing Home

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Alabama
  3. Alabaster Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we can reach out to you using automated calling technology.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Shannon Cook
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Cannot say enough great things about the caregivers at this facility. They treat their patients and families like their own family. I would recommend anyone looking for short term rehab or long term care to visit Shelby Ridge!

  • Noel Williams
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    My brother was admitted to this hell hole against the family's will after leaving the Spain Spine Center at UAB. My brother was alert and in good spirits when he arrived there after spending 6 weeks at Spain; looked forward to getting back to work. He was dead within two weeks. Not a smoker or drinker nor did illegal drugs. No major medical conditions other than the surgery to his C spine for a fall; he was 48 years of age, and worked for the Federal Government. We are waiting the results of the autopsy. If you love your family member, do not send them to this facility. They are the worst!

  • SAL ROSSI
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    I was there for 5 weeks.The therapy was able to take me from not being able to stand on my own to walking 90 feet with a walker.They taught me to care for myself and shape up my upper body.Lesley and Stephaney were the beautiful people I worked with.I think of them as family.They gave me another chance. The nurses and CA's were great and made every effort to do a very difficult job.They do a lot of work with much undo criticism. I am very pleased with many people there Katina,Massamino,Shirley,Veronica,and many more.Thanks all,Sal Rossi

  • Ellen Scalise
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I was in there after 5 weeks in the hospital, and this the worst excuse for a rehab facility. It's primarily a nursing home with therapy. I arrived on Tuesday afternoon and therapy didn't start until Thursday. I requested transfer to another facility Thursday morning and the discharge person pussyfoot around for 4 hours before faxing my info to the next facility. The food is very unhealthy, a bunch of nasty fried foods. And as another person wrote, the Nighshift is horrible. My roommate would call out for someone because she couldn't see to use the call button and they would never reply. They definitely do not deserve the ONE star I gave, but you have to select one to write a review!

  • Nicole Smith
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    If I could I would give them a -5 stars, they almost let my father slip into a diabetic coma because they are horrible at patient care. I would never send my worst enemy to this facility!!

About Shelby Ridge Nursing Home

General Information

Legal Business NameShelby Ridge Acquisition Corporation
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 10, 1991 (28 years)
Capacity131
Residents123
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Shelby Ridge Nursing Home

Shelby Ridge Nursing Home was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Alabama Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 15, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

October 29, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Shelby Ridge Nursing Home require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 15min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 20min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 25min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
98.1%
98.1%
98.1%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.0%
98.9%
95.9%
94.8%
93.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
22.9%
21.3%
26.5%
30.8%
42.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.2%
32.5%
36.9%
37.6%
29.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
21.3%
21.9%
14.3%
8.7%
15.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.6%
13.0%
15.5%
12.5%
18.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.8%
12.2%
9.6%
5.9%
12.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.5%
10.8%
4.1%
8.3%
8.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.2%
4.0%
5.9%
4.0%
5.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.1%
3.2%
5.1%
6.2%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.0%
1.1%
3.1%
5.2%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.6%
2.5%
0.8%
1.5%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

92.1%
87.9%
81.3%
78.8%
83.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.3%
81.1%
81.1%
81.1%
81.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.0%
63.1%
67.9%
77.4%
62.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
0.0%
0.5%
0.5%
1.5%
12.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.2%
1.1%
0.6%
1.2%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.2%
0.4%
0.2%
0.4%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places