Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Oak Park

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Alabama (AL)
  4. Auburn
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Oak Park

General Information

Legal Business NameThe East Alabama Healthcare Authority
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 19, 2004 (13 years)
Capacity87
Residents78
Percent Occupied90%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalYes
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Oak Park

Oak Park
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Alabama Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 14, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

March 5, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Oak Park require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 40min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
60min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
20min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr
3hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
98.8%
100.0%
98.8%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
55.0%
43.5%
-
-
41.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.9%
28.8%
31.3%
20.5%
29.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
4.2%
11.8%
7.8%
12.9%
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
23.5%
19.2%
16.7%
16.7%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.0%
7.9%
8.3%
1.5%
12.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
17.6%
21.4%
19.3%
15.1%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.9%
1.3%
6.8%
2.6%
7.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.5%
3.8%
8.2%
8.0%
5.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.6%
2.5%
1.4%
1.3%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
1.2%
1.4%
1.2%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1%
1.0%
1.2%
0.9%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
-
77.3%
90.9%
82.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
79.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
55.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
0.0%
4.6%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened