Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

St Martin's In The Pines

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Alabama (AL)
  4. Birmingham
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    I love working at St. Martin's in the Pines. I am the Director of the Courtyard, our new moderately priced Independent Living. The food around St. Martin's is great! I have worked in this field for quite sometime and say that without a doubt. Our pastoral care team is phenomenal.They go above and beyond to know our residents that move into our faith-based community. Faith is at our foundation and enriching the lives of our Elders is what we aim to do.

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    St. Martin's is a great place to work! There is a friendly atmosphere on campus and the staff truly cares about the loved ones and residents. Come take a tour and see for yourself!

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    If I could give less than 1 star I would. This was 6 months of HELL!!

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    The quality of care at St. Martin's is inconsistent. Most people there are very nice and helpful. The food is also very good. However, my elderly sister approached a group of employees at the nursing station for help with her husband who was in the rehab facility recovering from surgery. They didn't answer the call light earlier and he needed to use the restroom. They were unwilling to help and told her they weren't "trained" for that. They had been helping him prior to that as it was part of his rehabilitation not to mention his dignity. My sister was offered absolutely no assistance and had to help him herself. I called the nurses desk to get her some help and the person who answered didn't even bother saying hello but held the phone up in the air for a moment before hanging up on me. They must not be trained to use the phone either. Then, as we were leaving after an afternoon visit, the director of nursing came out to the parking lot and had a very non-hipaa compliant conference with us about my family member's care outside in the open in front of whoever happened to be walking by. She tried to rationalize why the employees there would not offer to help my family member. I was embarrassed for her and walked off. My sister needed help. Not one employee offered to assist her. Any prudent compassionate person in a similar situation would have helped.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

About St Martin's In The Pines

General Information

Legal Business NameEpiscopal Foundation Of Jefferson County
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 9, 1997 (20 years)
Capacity128
Residents116
Percent Occupied91%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for St Martin's In The Pines

St Martin's In The Pines
was reviewed by to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Alabama Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 11, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssure that each residents assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionCompletely assess the resident at least every twelve months.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssess in a timely manner the resident when the resident enters the nursing home.

July 16, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that special or therapeutic diets are ordered by the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

March 19, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of St Martin's In The Pines require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 50min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
60min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 35min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

64.9%
90.2%
90.3%
90.3%
93.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.4%
91.6%
84.7%
78.7%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.0%
74.1%
-
-
41.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.9%
15.7%
17.8%
26.1%
29.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
30.2%
22.5%
20.8%
25.8%
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.7%
11.6%
8.3%
10.8%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.7%
13.3%
17.0%
16.0%
12.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.5%
4.9%
-
21.4%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.2%
17.9%
19.7%
11.8%
7.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.9%
5.2%
6.5%
5.3%
5.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.3%
6.3%
8.5%
5.4%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.1%
3.2%
4.2%
1.1%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.1%
4.1%
4.5%
2.3%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

55.0%
53.8%
44.6%
44.9%
82.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
27.1%
53.9%
53.5%
54.3%
79.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
63.4%
63.4%
66.3%
65.2%
55.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
7.3%
9.5%
6.3%
12.2%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.0%
1.0%
6.2%
3.7%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places