Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Coosa Valley Health And Rehab

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Alabama
  3. Glencoe Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Patti Neal
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    I can honestly say that they don't care about their employees. I was a dedicated employee that truly cared for my residents and my residents loved me back. I tried so hard to make sure that my patients were kept clean and comfortable. I worked overtime when they were short staffed, anytime they needed me. I really cared. I saw good nurses get fired for no reason. They have no respect for the good people that try to do a good job. They show no loyalty for the staff. This is why the place can't keep good people that try. This is why they have such a poor score. The nurses are pushed beyond their limits, and they are always short staffed. The residents don't get the proper care they deserve, because they either push good people away, or they have people who come in to work and end up quitting after being worked to death, getting no loyalty from the administration. I had high hopes that if I came in worked hard, took excellent care of my patients that it would gain myself a positive impact and I would stay till retirement. This place is miserable. Every single day. I wouldn't have a family member admitted to their facility. Lots of other great nursing homes in the area to choose from.

  • Darla Newman
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    This place is horrible. They could care less about your loved one. They let them lay in a mess for hours at a time. They loose all of their clothes even if you tell them that you will do their laundry. If you care about your Loved one do not take them to this place. It is a joke. I would not take a stray dog to this place.

  • Jeremy Phillips
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Great ? ?

  • Jennifer Freeman
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

  • Tammy Haney
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

About Coosa Valley Health And Rehab

General Information

Legal Business NameC.R. Of Coosa Valley, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 1, 1977 (42 years)
Capacity124
Residents93
Percent Occupied75%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Coosa Valley Health And Rehab

Coosa Valley Health And Rehab was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Alabama Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 15, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Review the work of each nurse aide every year; and 2) give regular in-service training based upon these reviews.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Coosa Valley Health And Rehab require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 15min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.2%
97.6%
97.6%
97.6%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
98.7%
100.0%
100.0%
93.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
51.3%
48.6%
45.9%
47.4%
42.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
43.9%
42.0%
47.3%
37.7%
29.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
31.1%
41.8%
38.2%
28.7%
15.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
40.9%
32.8%
34.3%
33.8%
18.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.0%
25.8%
29.9%
8.7%
12.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.7%
2.7%
6.8%
0.0%
8.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.8%
10.2%
5.9%
12.8%
5.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
8.8%
11.3%
15.6%
7.4%
4.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.7%
5.4%
8.1%
9.3%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6%
2.7%
2.5%
1.2%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.0%
1.6%
2.4%
2.5%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
98.8%
83.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.6%
97.9%
97.9%
97.9%
81.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.4%
64.1%
67.5%
65.2%
62.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
5.9%
16.2%
17.3%
15.6%
12.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.7%
2.0%
8.2%
8.5%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places