Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Marshall Manor Nursing Home

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Alabama
  3. Guntersville Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we can reach out to you using automated calling technology.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Vickie Thompson
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I use to volunteer here. Its in a quiet community. They do have a lot of activities for their patients.

  • Bobby Wilbanks
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Crappy place take your loved-one somewhere else.trust me you'll be glad you did

  • Autumn Martin
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Not working there anymore but by far the best job I have EVER had. I loved the people I worked with and my residents. Only problem I ever had there was some of the people there did not care AT ALL about their job or residents. We all had our bad days but definitely loved my job. Amazing place to work. I loved it!

  • pam vogt
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Marshall Manor is a caring environment with a family atmosphere. Love the residents and staff there.

  • David Denham
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I would advise avoiding this place at all costs. My grandmother was admitted to Marshall Manor for rehab. Shortly afterward we found out she had lung cancer that had moved into her bones also. They consistently served food that was horrible, and in some cases unidentifiable. She was bed bound and had to push the nurse call button for assistance to use the bathroom. Once it was an HOUR before anyone came to help her. Finally, when we were trying to coordinate transportation for her appointment at the cancer care center, they were absolutely unwilling to help until I enlisted the help of the ombudsmen and threatened to file a complaint with their corporate office. They went so far as to lie to the scheduler from the Cancer Care Center when she called herself to try to arrange transportation. They claimed my grandmother was "very mobile". She was totally bed bound. When the Dr and the Cancer Care Center saw my grandmother, he apologized profusely and said he had been misled about her condition. He had her admitted immediately to Shepherd's Cove (a hospice facility). I regret immensely that my grandmother had to spend two of her final weeks at this horrible facility.

About Marshall Manor Nursing Home

General Information

Legal Business NamePreferred Health Holdings LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 25, 1982 (36 years)
Capacity91
Residents87
Percent Occupied96%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Marshall Manor Nursing Home

Marshall Manor Nursing Home was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Alabama Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 18, 2017 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.

May 5, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Marshall Manor Nursing Home require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 60min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
60min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 35min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
98.6%
93.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
44.0%
27.6%
37.0%
40.0%
42.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.1%
35.9%
37.3%
33.9%
29.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
38.7%
32.5%
22.7%
20.9%
15.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.4%
21.1%
19.4%
19.7%
18.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.0%
18.3%
14.0%
15.5%
12.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.2%
9.0%
12.9%
5.6%
8.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.0%
1.9%
10.0%
1.9%
5.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
1.3%
4.2%
3.6%
4.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.0%
5.5%
2.9%
1.4%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9%
2.7%
1.4%
0.0%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2%
3.5%
1.9%
1.8%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
93.1%
93.8%
83.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.9%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
81.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
63.7%
74.6%
72.8%
62.9%
62.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
1.6%
4.1%
16.3%
19.0%
12.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
2.0%
1.7%
1.9%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places