Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Springhill Senior Residence

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Alabama (AL)
  4. Mobile
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Rachel Gaut
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    Wonderful staff, very attentive to the resident's needs. Lots of activities, for residents of all different cognitive levels, to participate in. Fabulous unit manager and great administrative crew; 5/5!

  • Carol Hunt
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mother came here after a 4 day hospital stay. She was in need of physical therapy to strengthen her so she could come home and safely. The staff was wonderful. They came took her to therapy and encouraged her to do her best. They were attentive to her needs and checked on her regularly. The room was a single room a bit small but was big enough for our limited stay. They had a range of activities to participate in, a beauty shop, and a dining area should you not want to eat in your room. When discharge happens the social director sets up aftercare and arranges for anything you may need like medical supplies so your loved one has what she needs to be safe at home. I would recommend this place and if needed would come here again.

  • Bart Longenecker
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I have been a member of the Springhill Senior Residence rehab section for six weeks. During the first 21 days I made progress with with both PT and OT tasks. I am disappointed there was no formal follow-up, but I am understanding of MEDICARE limitations. The did provide, however, written instructions for daily use--I have used these faithfully! The staff and administration have treated me with respect, helpfulness, and amazing kindness. There a lot of people here, and all are well attuned to this vision. A lot of folks here need service, and the staff has been excellent at solving problems in a reasonable time. The dietary service have been very good. The meals are different, and attention is paid towards providing a pleasing menu. Coffee service is provided in the lounge (Keogh) on a self service basis. For my needs there are of inadequate number of electrical outlets. The AC and TV run consistently well. There is one light above the sink that refuses to cooperate. I have needed an oxygen concentration device. The furnished device works well. For travel on and off campus tanks of oxygen have been made available and work well. My room and the entire facility are very clean. The staff uses reusable floor pads to reduce possibility of disease. Rooms are wiped-down daily. The cleaning staff has been very pleasant and accommodating to schedule changes and visitors. Case management and financial services have been extremely helpful. Unfortunately I have placed some demand on them.. It has been very convenient for me to have both Cardiology Associates as well as the staff of Springhill hospital available within a hundred yards.

  • symone yates
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    I wouldnt put my worst enemy here. I know staff personal and the cna's have had to buy supplies for the residents because the office staff wont supply them. The rooms are nasty and the call lights are broken. The place is unsanitary. They have roaches and the entire building is dirty. It smells like dust and diapers. If you knew the truth, you would stay far away! Hate I had to learn the hard way.

  • Libby King
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    for a month i tried to find my mom a good clean nice living senior home, and i couldn't decide, and soon as i walked into Springhill Senior Residents there were so nice and clean with very nice loving staff. This one girl that were sitting at the desk was so very kind and helpful and always wore a smile on her face and so caring, i knew this might be a place for my mom. so as i looked around at the facility, staff and residents, everybody seemed so happy, clean, and healthy. so i took the chance to get my mom a room and let me tell you me and my mom experience there was wonderful. they deserve a 6 star

About Springhill Senior Residence

General Information

Legal Business NameSpringhill Nursing Homes Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 6, 1997 (20 years)
Capacity151
Residents96
Percent Occupied64%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Springhill Senior Residence

Springhill Senior Residence
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Alabama Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 21, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

October 8, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

March 13, 2014 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$6,400 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Springhill Senior Residence require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

91.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.3%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
28.1%
20.0%
37.5%
48.0%
41.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.5%
16.9%
18.0%
18.0%
29.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
28.5%
19.8%
22.8%
17.6%
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
25.0%
22.9%
21.9%
24.6%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.4%
10.0%
15.4%
12.5%
12.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
32.5%
35.3%
17.5%
4.8%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.9%
5.3%
8.9%
8.2%
7.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.5%
11.8%
9.8%
9.6%
5.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.4%
0.0%
6.8%
1.4%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
2.6%
5.1%
2.7%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.6%
97.7%
100.0%
100.0%
82.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.9%
99.1%
99.1%
99.1%
79.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
48.5%
59.7%
72.9%
80.0%
55.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
20.4%
16.6%
18.2%
14.4%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.4%
2.5%
0.7%
1.4%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.8%
0.4%
0.0%
0.4%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places