Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Springhill Senior Residence

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Alabama
  3. Mobile Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Lori Phillips
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    I wanted to share my experience with Springhill. I went unexpectedly to Springhill. I'm new to Mobile, had no idea how to pick a rehab center after surgery. I'm so glad I picked Springhill. It's clean, cnas are very helpful and genuinely offer to help then do help. I was a whiney baby while I was there due to pain but staff were patient, helpful, kind from start to finish. Nursing, unit manager and social work staff were phenomenal. They had one day notice to prep for my discharge. It was a smooth transition. Even when I had to call them at home for something needed, they made sure I had it. They were Johnny on the spot. They made sure my surgical success would carry on at home by making sure I had equipment needed, services needed. I was a nursing home ombudsman years ago and Springhill staff is miles ahead from what I had to deal with years ago. Also having that inside view of nursing homes let's you see things as they are. I'm telling you exactly as it is. I have another surgery planned and Springhill is where I'll go after that surgery too.

  • lisa horn
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    My Father was a long time resident at SSR. Initially I was please with the care he was given. In the past few months my Father medical needs were neglected causing him to develop several infections.

  • Ella Fiedler
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    Nurses and staff are phenomenal! Environment is very clean and comfortable. I am very impressed and would highly recommend to anyone!

  • Esther Grube
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Staff became family to us in the short time my mom was here. Happy to go home, but sad to leave the ones we met while here.

  • Robyn Dalton
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My father in-law did physical therapy at Springhill Rehab & Senior Residence and made great progress. The nurses, CNA's and staff were so attentive to his needs and gave great care. The rooms were clean and had all the creature comforts needed, the meals were awesome and the staff was so friendly and courteous. I knew my father in-law was in great hands. One nurse ("K") was so kind and helpful not only to my father in-law but wonderful in explaining to things to my family. After my father in-law left the facility, nurse "K" checked in to see how he was doing. Talk about five star service from beginning to even after being discharged. I highly recommend to anyone that is in need of therapy where the ENTIRE staff will take care of you and puts your needs as priority one.

About Springhill Senior Residence

General Information

Legal Business NameSpringhill Nursing Homes Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 6, 1997 (22 years)
Capacity151
Residents91
Percent Occupied60%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Springhill Senior Residence

Springhill Senior Residence was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Alabama Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 12, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Springhill Senior Residence require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
60min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
55min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 45min
4hr
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
64.0%
57.1%
76.0%
82.8%
42.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.7%
24.6%
25.0%
26.4%
29.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
21.3%
41.6%
19.1%
25.9%
15.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.0%
17.6%
14.5%
22.1%
18.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.1%
5.6%
5.8%
6.4%
12.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.5%
13.6%
13.5%
8.2%
8.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.9%
5.8%
7.3%
9.9%
4.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.7%
11.1%
6.9%
7.1%
5.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.3%
2.5%
4.1%
5.5%
3.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.3%
1.2%
2.6%
4.1%
3.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
83.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.1%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
81.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.0%
84.8%
77.8%
79.3%
62.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
6.8%
12.1%
11.4%
11.0%
12.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.4%
1.6%
0.8%
0.0%
2.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
0.3%
0.9%
0.6%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017AL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places