Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Westminster Village

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Alabama (AL)
  4. Spanish Fort
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    Westminster Village is a wonderful place to live and work . The beauty of the place is outstanding. The residents who live here realize when they come here they have found their home. I cannot say enough about how outstanding this Retirement Community and Nursing facality is. No I don't live here I worked here for 18 years. Retired. My dream is to come back to work here one day. I miss each and every Resident.

  • ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    This is a beautiful place to live and everyone is friendly. The dining facilities are always clean, bright and full of delicious food! The waiting list is long, but anyone I talked to told me it was worth the wait. Plenty of activities to do with family and friends, plus a putting green, gardens all around and healthcare on site!

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Not discussing care for their clients, my family has had a very difficult time with the administrative side of our estate following the death of my grandmother. In the contract her estate was supposed to receive back 80% of the purchase price after the sale of the unit. My Grandmother passed away almost four years ago and they continue to say that the unit has not sold. According to the contract they give themselves no timetable to sell the unit within. This not only holds a substantial amount of money for the estate hostage, but it makes it so we are unable to finalize and close out the estate. We were told there was a wait list to get in when my grandmother purchased the apartment and now there hasn't been a single offer in the four years since her death. Very shady business practice. I recommend you find another place that is honest in their intentions when you choose to place your loved one in a retirement community.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    My mother has lived in Westminster Village for 3 years. She has been in Independent living, but had a falllast year and went to rehab in skilled care for 5 weeks. This place is wonderful. The care in both independent and skilled is very good. The staff are caring and compassionate. In any facility you will have isolated instances where there is an issue, however the overall care is very good. I can't imagine Mom being anywhere else. Recently she had another fall and they transported her to the hospital. The social worker was great working with the hospital to get her into rehab again and taking care of everything. Living far away, I don't know what we would do without Westminster Village care!

  • ★★★★★ 6 years ago

    Facilities are showy and nice, but only good for those who can care for themselves, need transportation, and dining services. Assisted care and skilled nursing is run by a very unprofessional management staff that is resistant to therapist expertise and a team approach to patient care. If you are wanting a competent and highly skilled nursing staff responsible for treating medical care, this is not the place. Don't buy into this mistake.

About Westminster Village

General Information

Legal Business NamePresbyterian Retirement Corporation Inc
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 7, 1983 (34 years)
Capacity48
Residents44
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Westminster Village

Westminster Village
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Alabama Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 5, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Westminster Village require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 50min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
55min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 40min
3hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
97.4%
97.4%
97.4%
93.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
41.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.0%
16.7%
25.0%
50.0%
29.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.9%
8.6%
6.9%
3.1%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.0%
5.0%
-
20.0%
12.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
-
4.6%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.6%
5.7%
0.0%
3.0%
7.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
14.3%
16.7%
-
4.8%
5.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9%
14.3%
6.9%
12.1%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.3%
2.9%
0.0%
9.1%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.0%
5.0%
2.1%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.6%
98.8%
98.8%
95.9%
82.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.6%
92.8%
92.8%
92.8%
79.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
58.2%
53.8%
71.7%
78.7%
55.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
9.7%
9.3%
5.3%
5.7%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.0%
3.2%
1.6%
3.4%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places