Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Coosa Valley Nursing Facility

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Alabama (AL)
  4. Sylacauga
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Great facility! Very caring and attentive staff and clean facility! Much better than Children's at Birmingham. They treated our one year old so wonderfully! He was very comfortable as was my husband and I! We prefer this hospital for our kids!

  • ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    The E.R. IS HORRIBLE! We waited a hour and a half...my mom was admitted...we were in the back Er section from 5:30 until 1:30 when she finally got a room...Last year my sister was throwing up uncontrollably and they sent her home. I took her to Citizens in Talladega and they admitted her. Shame on CVMC! I was admitted a month ago and everything was good once I was admitted . Waiting in the waiting area was too long (I was in pain). The Er doctor was great but why are they SOOOOOO SLOW! The whole Er staff needs to be evaluated! Throw out the TRASH NOW! Professionalism is at an all time low!

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    I had a baby at CVMC in June. I love hospital staff. The staff is nice with the exception of one nurse that had a bad attitude. They could definitely step it up on the cleanliness of the rooms at CVMC. The floors and showers are filthy. My husband spilled water on the floor in the labor & delivery and when he wiped it up the napkin was black.. The floors are in general sticky in both rooms we were in. The shower had ring worm growing on the curtain. I don't understand why there is such a lack of cleanliness when bleeding follows birth. And the lady that cleans is horrible. She sprays a lot of cleaning solution on the sink and toilet then does a quick wipe off, throws a card at you while you and your baby are choking on the fumes, and runs out the door. Aside from the minor filth of the rooms I would suggest this place just because the nurses are so awesome and I believe Dr. Rehberg is the best OBGYN.

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    If you want to be treated like a drug addict or like listening to smart mouth doctor then this is the place. I went a couple times for infection the last trip there all the doctor was studying was making comments about pain meds. When i was trying to explane what was goin on he would say in the middle of me talking, let me stop you right there, then the comments about pain meds came. Like telling me that made it ok for him to cut me off when i couldnt even finish telling him what was wrong. I didnt go for his comments i went because the antibiotics were not working. The nurses done great but doc on hand had a major chip on his shoulder. I never once asked for pain meds i just stated to him i am hurting and want to make sure the infection is not worse. I will not be going there again. Worst E.R. I have ever visited!

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Not a problem after being released from ER...wonderful staff and treatment on 2 was in room 270 very clean great nurses...great care by my doctors every department I came in contact with fast and clean...food was not bad for hospital food

About Coosa Valley Nursing Facility

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Sylacauga Health Care Authority
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Other
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1967 ()
Capacity85
Residents82
Percent Occupied96%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalYes
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Coosa Valley Nursing Facility

Coosa Valley Nursing Facility
was reviewed by to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Alabama Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 26, 2016 - 1 year ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$15,259 fine
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 21 days
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

June 5, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Provide 3 meals at regular times; 2) serve breakfast within 14 hours of dinner; and 3) offer a snack at bedtime each day.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide proof that residents' personal money that is deposited with the nursing home is secure.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep each resident free from physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Coosa Valley Nursing Facility require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 10min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 45min
3hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.5%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.3%
98.2%
96.3%
96.4%
92.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
4.2%
17.4%
20.0%
25.0%
41.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.8%
29.5%
25.6%
30.6%
29.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
7.9%
8.2%
7.5%
21.9%
15.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
26.3%
24.1%
22.6%
18.2%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.7%
8.3%
8.1%
15.0%
12.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.0%
3.8%
0.0%
1.7%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.5%
16.7%
11.3%
3.6%
7.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.1%
12.5%
6.1%
5.3%
5.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.6%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.4%
3.6%
3.7%
3.6%
3.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.7%
4.4%
1.2%
2.6%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

84.1%
84.8%
88.8%
92.8%
82.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.1%
78.4%
78.4%
78.4%
79.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
43.9%
66.9%
83.7%
77.7%
55.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
25.2%
23.3%
12.5%
11.5%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.9%
1.7%
1.4%
2.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
1.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AL
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places