Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Bradford House Nursing And Rehab, LLC

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Arkansas (AR)
  4. Bentonville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Lori Davison
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    The best place ive ever worked!

  • Brandon Nelson
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    They are always understaffed on 400 hall let aids do two person assist by then self and only gets there Caro together when state comes

  • Stacie McCarley
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    This place is a negligence suit just waiting to happen.

  • Amanda Stansell
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

About Bradford House Nursing And Rehab, LLC

General Information

Legal Business NameBradford House Nursing And Rehab, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 15, 2002 (15 years)
Capacity98
Residents85
Percent Occupied87%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Bradford House Nursing And Rehab, LLC

Bradford House Nursing And Rehab, LLC
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Arkansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 28, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.

July 26, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.

December 18, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Bradford House Nursing And Rehab, LLC require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 20min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 25min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

94.5%
98.7%
98.7%
98.7%
96.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
98.6%
100.0%
100.0%
94.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
54.1%
42.9%
40.0%
40.0%
37.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.3%
19.2%
24.3%
25.4%
25.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
9.9%
15.6%
10.9%
15.4%
15.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
16.9%
21.9%
17.3%
14.1%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.1%
10.6%
15.5%
30.8%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.0%
4.4%
5.6%
8.6%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.3%
2.7%
6.7%
2.8%
6.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.8%
10.3%
4.4%
1.8%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.4%
4.2%
0.0%
4.4%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.4%
1.4%
1.3%
0.0%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2%
4.1%
4.0%
2.8%
4.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.0%
6.9%
5.4%
9.7%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.0%
100.0%
98.9%
100.0%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.5%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
77.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
46.1%
52.9%
68.6%
70.7%
64.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
15.6%
8.4%
9.4%
7.5%
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.1%
4.4%
2.9%
2.9%
2.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.1%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places