Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Spring Creek Health & Rehab

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Arkansas (AR)
  4. Cabot
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Spring Creek Health & Rehab

General Information

Legal Business NameScnc, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 26, 2003 (14 years)
Capacity109
Residents72
Percent Occupied66%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Spring Creek Health & Rehab

Spring Creek Health & Rehab
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Arkansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 17, 2016 - 11 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.

May 25, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmComplaintProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.

November 12, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.

April 15, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmComplaintMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.

November 20, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

September 26, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Spring Creek Health & Rehab require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 55min
2hr 5min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
3hr 40min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.3%
93.6%
93.6%
93.6%
96.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.5%
86.1%
84.0%
73.3%
94.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
21.4%
23.5%
21.9%
20.0%
37.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.7%
26.5%
22.2%
18.6%
25.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
27.7%
26.0%
12.3%
41.9%
15.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
26.5%
16.2%
12.7%
16.7%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.2%
18.5%
17.6%
36.8%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
6.3%
1.3%
0.0%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.0%
2.8%
4.1%
11.3%
6.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.3%
2.6%
8.6%
7.7%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.7%
0.0%
0.0%
4.2%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2%
4.2%
5.3%
9.3%
4.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.7%
5.2%
4.9%
3.9%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

55.6%
56.5%
44.0%
20.0%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.6%
52.2%
52.2%
52.2%
77.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
64.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
2.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.9%
2.8%
7.6%
3.5%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened