Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

St Elizabeth's Place

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Arkansas (AR)
  4. Jonesboro
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    I worked at this place for almost three years. And when I was there I noticed very very VERY! little changes in helping the patients there! First off they could never stay consistent with the staff, people come and go in the Nursing department, the Housekeeping Department and the Kitchen Department! No one stayed here for no more than a few months til a year or weeks! Second- The care provided, the CNAs did not care about these people they were suppose to provide care for. They would be rude and nasty, almost down right hateful to the elderly people. Also When you tell the administration or your nurses you would get in trouble for telling. And they would not do anything to those Bastards who are abusing the residents Verbally! THE CNAS there stole money and property from residents, such as mobile devices! And fought over who would get what hall! The black CNAS are the worst ones! Third- The fire you for fighting for the patients rights, and what should be done. Instead of firing the lazy, ignorant hateful CNAs who don't want to do their job, but can talk about nails and hair all day at the nurses station! THIS PLACE NEEDS TO BE SHUT DOWN!

  • ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    Very mean to the residents! The Mangers are rude talk to you any kind of way they don't care about the residents by letting them seat in there old cloths and having them smell bad that pay low and use staff like slaves i will never ask anyone who loves there parents that they can't take care of to send them there! Also food they don't wash there hands so that's why they stay sick! Staff are rude and they don't do background check! Smh poor service! Also they like to post pictures while at work! When the in the building it smell so bad! They don't pass out there snacks for lunch and for night! The kitchen staff always outside Somking! But when they come in they don't wash there hands! Also HR she's is very rude to staff ! That place always have state come in because things are not fix and they're not on there job!

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Very impressed with this Nursing Home . We were at JHC and rehab .for three months . The food was terrible and always cold . Very poor management in the whole facility . . Would not recommend that Facility to anyone .

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Nursing staff is horrible and rude. They dont give meds as prescribed, call lights are not answered in a timely manner, and they don't give baths like they are supposed to. If a resident passes away, they don't give baths that week, at least that is what they told our family.

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    horrible

About St Elizabeth's Place

General Information

Legal Business NameJonesboro Care And Rehabilitation Center, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 5, 2003 (15 years)
Capacity110
Residents83
Percent Occupied75%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for St Elizabeth's Place

St Elizabeth's Place
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Arkansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 31, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of St Elizabeth's Place require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 10min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

90.8%
90.5%
90.5%
90.5%
96.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
97.3%
100.0%
94.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
68.3%
57.1%
67.4%
54.3%
37.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.7%
19.4%
25.4%
25.4%
25.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
13.4%
14.5%
15.4%
37.8%
15.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
7.6%
5.8%
8.2%
7.0%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.6%
10.6%
7.0%
4.5%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
1.6%
1.4%
1.6%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.5%
5.8%
5.6%
4.2%
6.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.6%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.1%
1.7%
5.9%
1.7%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.0%
7.1%
2.8%
0.0%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.5%
2.9%
4.1%
4.2%
4.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
2.3%
0.0%
1.2%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

92.7%
78.0%
68.6%
67.6%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.6%
78.8%
78.8%
78.8%
77.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.3%
52.4%
65.2%
62.2%
64.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
3.8%
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.1%
2.1%
0.9%
0.9%
2.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.1%
1.0%
2.5%
1.5%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places