Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Presbyterian Village, Inc

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Arkansas (AR)
  4. Little Rock
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Presbyterian Village, Inc

General Information

Legal Business NamePresbyterian Village Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 9, 2010 (7 years)
Capacity78
Residents70
Percent Occupied90%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Presbyterian Village, Inc

Presbyterian Village, Inc
was reviewed by to have a rating of 1 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Arkansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 23, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

April 22, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssure that each residentís assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

May 14, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssure that each residentís assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.

June 27, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$18,200 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Presbyterian Village, Inc require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
30min
ReportedExpected
LPN
20min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
3hr 40min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

93.5%
93.9%
93.9%
93.9%
96.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.9%
96.8%
98.5%
98.4%
94.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
23.1%
37.5%
45.0%
37.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.7%
16.4%
14.5%
14.8%
25.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
8.8%
8.7%
13.5%
16.9%
15.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.9%
8.1%
12.3%
14.5%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.9%
9.3%
14.5%
26.5%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.5%
9.1%
7.9%
8.1%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.6%
14.5%
7.8%
11.7%
6.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.9%
5.6%
10.0%
7.0%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.9%
1.7%
1.8%
8.6%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.9%
4.8%
6.2%
0.0%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.4%
3.2%
3.1%
4.8%
4.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1%
1.1%
2.8%
4.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
1.6%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

77.1%
64.7%
80.6%
83.3%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
65.1%
55.9%
55.9%
55.9%
77.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
64.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
13.8%
20.0%
9.5%
-
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.6%
3.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.6%
2.7%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened