Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Premier Health And Rehabilitation Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Arkansas (AR)
  4. North Little Rock
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Premier Health And Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NamePulaski Operations LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 9, 2000 (17 years)
Capacity132
Residents121
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Premier Health And Rehabilitation Center

Premier Health And Rehabilitation Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Arkansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 7, 2016 - 7 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

February 4, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$11,993 fine
JFewImmediate JeopardyComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

September 17, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.

January 23, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

October 3, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionListen to the resident groups and act on their complaints and suggestions that affect resident care and life.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide timely notification to the resident before transfer or discharge.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Premier Health And Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
20min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 50min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

91.4%
94.6%
94.6%
94.6%
96.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.0%
85.0%
79.8%
91.5%
94.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
71.4%
48.6%
52.6%
41.0%
37.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
5.7%
6.8%
7.8%
9.1%
25.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
5.5%
5.6%
14.9%
9.0%
15.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.5%
8.4%
13.1%
11.9%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
8.3%
11.4%
11.6%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.4%
8.8%
2.0%
0.0%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.1%
5.0%
9.7%
10.5%
6.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
3.9%
3.9%
7.8%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
1.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.0%
4.0%
5.8%
6.7%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.0%
4.0%
1.0%
1.9%
4.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
2.0%
0.9%
1.5%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

68.3%
57.5%
54.0%
58.2%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
68.2%
59.0%
59.0%
59.0%
77.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.4%
60.5%
69.2%
74.5%
64.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
5.8%
3.1%
4.8%
8.3%
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.3%
2.6%
2.8%
1.8%
2.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.1%
1.9%
2.7%
0.0%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened