Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Maples At Har-Ber Meadows

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Arkansas (AR)
  4. Springdale
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Laura Towns
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Though there were a few hiccups, my 3 month stay at Maples was pleasant. The workers went out of their way to try to make me as comfortable as possible. The therapists worked me hard but always with my interest in mind. Everyone from the Administration to the housekeepers and Laundry showed me that they wanted me to succeed.

  • Ashlie Turner
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    My grandmother was a patient at this facility and the care was not at all up to the standards I would have thought it should have been. The cnas are always understaffed and management is no help at all from what I saw. This is not somewhere I would ever recommend someone sending someone they loved. Hopefully this place can get under better management. I feel sorry for the patients that are still living there I took my grandmother out of there immediately when I saw how bad it is. There were roaches in the dinning room which can't be sanitary.

  • Danny Barron
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    My cousin was here, I was somewhat appalled at the response time when she signalled she needed to go to the restroom. And while I didn't mind, I was somewhat surprised to be asked to help.

  • A Google User
    ★★★★★ 8 years ago

    Throughout my tenure at this facility, several incidents occurred that quickly soured my once high regard of this facility as an employer. The lack of communication from the administration down to its employees leaves much to be desired. The employee to employee interaction is confrontational at best. In my honest and sincere opinion, a true team player should in no way, shape, form or fashion apply to this facility if you have a strong work ethic and any self-respect whatsoever. It would seem to me that the administrative staff only is concerned that they themselves look good to the outside world. There appears to be no regard for what is right, and they will do whatever it takes to overlook blatent unethical activity, instead of taking appropriate action to rid themselves of those who repeatedly commit such acts, of which are well-known to administration and documented with state offices.

  • holly Guess
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

About The Maples At Har-Ber Meadows

General Information

Legal Business NameNwa Nursing Center, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 28, 2005 (12 years)
Capacity140
Residents129
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Maples At Har-Ber Meadows

The Maples At Har-Ber Meadows
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Arkansas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 25, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionReview or revise the resident's care plan after any major change in physical or mental health.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Maples At Har-Ber Meadows require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 45min
3hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.6%
99.2%
99.2%
99.2%
96.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.6%
88.6%
95.6%
97.2%
94.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
52.6%
33.3%
37.0%
21.3%
37.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.4%
28.4%
25.7%
30.1%
25.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
29.8%
14.1%
7.7%
13.7%
15.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
21.5%
18.9%
18.9%
17.9%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.0%
8.3%
15.7%
8.7%
15.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
19.0%
2.2%
6.1%
1.0%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.8%
4.4%
2.7%
7.4%
6.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.3%
5.2%
5.5%
1.9%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.0%
3.7%
1.8%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.9%
0.9%
1.8%
1.9%
4.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.8%
2.6%
3.5%
3.7%
4.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.9%
0.8%
1.6%
0.9%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

78.4%
74.2%
86.8%
93.2%
82.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.5%
78.3%
78.3%
78.3%
77.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.2%
86.3%
81.7%
79.3%
64.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
18.1%
25.0%
15.5%
5.2%
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.1%
3.4%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.5%
4.1%
3.6%
1.1%
1.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AR
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places