Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Lingenfelter Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Arizona (AZ)
  4. Kingman
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About The Lingenfelter Center

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Lingenfelter Center, Ltd
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 10, 2003 (14 years)
Capacity88
Residents83
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Lingenfelter Center

The Lingenfelter Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Arizona Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 3, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get specialized rehabilitative services per the patient's assessment or plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain their vision and hearing.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive notice to the resident before a room or roommate change.

October 1, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Lingenfelter Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
45min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
3hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
51.5%
58.8%
55.6%
57.6%
57.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.8%
26.3%
25.0%
28.0%
22.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
16.2%
14.3%
16.9%
15.6%
18.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
31.4%
36.2%
34.8%
35.2%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.8%
13.3%
15.8%
24.3%
13.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.4%
5.1%
14.1%
16.5%
9.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.8%
3.9%
5.2%
2.5%
6.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.9%
5.8%
5.1%
3.0%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.8%
2.6%
1.3%
2.5%
3.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.1%
5.1%
5.2%
3.8%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3%
2.3%
2.1%
2.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
89.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.7%
92.0%
92.0%
92.0%
86.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
61.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
17.4%
28.6%
17.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened