Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Mi Casa Nursing Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Arizona (AZ)
  4. Mesa
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Mi Casa Nursing Center

General Information

Legal Business NameMesa United Medical Investors Limited Partnership
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 27, 1985 (31 years)
Capacity180
Residents114
Percent Occupied63%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Mi Casa Nursing Center

Mi Casa Nursing Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Arizona Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 23, 2016 - 9 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive the right treatment and services to residents who display physical or psychosocial problems adapting to changes in circumstances.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

March 11, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Mi Casa Nursing Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 60min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 45min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 50min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.4%
96.4%
96.4%
96.4%
95.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
96.1%
97.5%
95.1%
96.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
65.6%
76.3%
59.1%
58.3%
57.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.3%
13.5%
14.1%
17.9%
22.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
23.1%
16.5%
4.8%
12.8%
18.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.1%
17.8%
22.1%
19.5%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.7%
9.3%
3.9%
9.0%
13.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.8%
2.5%
2.6%
1.1%
9.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.9%
2.6%
5.1%
4.9%
6.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.7%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

84.7%
82.4%
86.1%
85.5%
89.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.6%
80.9%
80.9%
80.9%
86.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
47.0%
58.1%
63.7%
54.2%
61.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
11.1%
9.1%
11.1%
18.7%
17.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.4%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened