Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Terraces Of Phoenix

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Arizona (AZ)
  4. Phoenix
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About The Terraces Of Phoenix

General Information

Legal Business NameAmerican Baptist Estates Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1967 ()
Capacity64
Residents44
Percent Occupied69%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Terraces Of Phoenix

The Terraces Of Phoenix
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Arizona Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 5, 2016 - 11 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive notice to the resident before a room or roommate change.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProtect each resident from all abuse, physical punishment, and involuntary separation from others.

May 6, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 12 days
---Fine$14,750 fine
KSomeImmediate JeopardyHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionReview or revise the resident's care plan after any major change in physical or mental health.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Terraces Of Phoenix require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 15min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 50min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 45min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
97.3%
100.0%
100.0%
96.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
82.8%
75.0%
72.7%
-
57.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
9.1%
9.7%
13.8%
11.1%
22.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
5.8%
11.9%
14.2%
13.1%
18.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.3%
13.5%
11.8%
9.7%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.0%
3.2%
6.9%
18.5%
13.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.9%
9.2%
-
-
9.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.7%
18.9%
20.6%
12.9%
6.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.5%
10.3%
0.0%
0.0%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.6%
5.4%
2.9%
3.2%
3.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6%
2.7%
5.9%
3.2%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.8%
6.2%
2.2%
3.1%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.2%
99.1%
95.7%
96.6%
89.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.9%
96.3%
96.3%
96.3%
86.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.7%
70.5%
59.0%
65.2%
61.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
10.3%
9.7%
9.4%
12.5%
17.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
3.3%
4.6%
1.1%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
1.3%
1.2%
1.7%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened