Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Lifestream At Cook Health Care

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Arizona (AZ)
  4. Youngtown
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Lifestream At Cook Health Care

General Information

Legal Business NameLifestream Complete Senior Living Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Other
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 26, 1986 (31 years)
Capacity128
Residents97
Percent Occupied76%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Lifestream At Cook Health Care

Lifestream At Cook Health Care
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Arizona Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 28, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

October 27, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Lifestream At Cook Health Care require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
3hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.6%
97.9%
97.9%
97.9%
95.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.1%
93.5%
98.8%
100.0%
96.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
68.1%
57.1%
60.0%
66.7%
57.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.2%
20.5%
15.5%
15.7%
22.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
15.5%
16.1%
16.7%
15.7%
18.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.9%
22.5%
14.8%
5.1%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.1%
11.5%
14.1%
8.8%
13.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
21.0%
17.7%
10.5%
12.8%
9.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.8%
9.8%
13.1%
8.5%
6.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.4%
4.1%
1.4%
1.7%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.9%
1.1%
1.2%
0.0%
3.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.5%
2.2%
1.2%
3.7%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
1.1%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

79.7%
81.8%
85.7%
91.3%
89.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
85.1%
85.5%
85.5%
85.5%
86.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
48.8%
51.3%
67.6%
58.7%
61.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
27.8%
11.4%
10.2%
10.9%
17.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
3.7%
6.9%
3.6%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened