Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Haven Of Yuma

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Arizona (AZ)
  4. Yuma
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Haven Of Yuma

General Information

Legal Business NameHaven Of Yuma LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 20, 1989 (28 years)
Capacity128
Residents87
Percent Occupied68%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Haven Of Yuma

Haven Of Yuma
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Arizona Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 26, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMake sure that all required doctor visits are made personally.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

February 18, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Haven Of Yuma require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 10min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

87.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.9%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
60.0%
65.2%
63.6%
61.5%
57.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.4%
18.8%
20.9%
22.6%
22.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.5%
20.1%
30.3%
17.7%
18.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
6.6%
1.8%
1.9%
1.7%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.4%
18.4%
7.1%
10.0%
13.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.9%
7.3%
10.9%
1.4%
9.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.7%
6.8%
5.5%
19.7%
6.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.5%
4.1%
2.2%
2.1%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
1.9%
1.9%
1.8%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.2%
13.6%
10.9%
3.3%
3.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
1.7%
1.8%
0.0%
3.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
2.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

95.7%
97.8%
99.1%
96.7%
89.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.5%
93.5%
93.5%
93.5%
86.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
57.0%
56.0%
64.2%
72.0%
61.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
11.1%
2.7%
2.0%
9.0%
17.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.9%
0.7%
1.3%
0.7%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
0.4%
0.4%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016AZ
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened