Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

California Park Rehabilitation Hospital

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. California
  3. Chico Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Shelly Hays-McNutt
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    My mother is in there right now. The girls are sweet and try their best. The food is terrible. When you get tuna fish three times in 3 days with a dry piece of bread, something is wrong.. I would not feed what is served for a meal to my dogs. I went out and bought a pizza for my mom and her room mate and they chowed it down. Food service needs to be looked at. These poor people are not served a balanced meal. Shame on them for serving this unhealthy food. And no, pizza is not the healthiest meal either but they were terribly hungry and the quickest thing for me to go pick up.

  • Marsha Brown
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I spent 2 weeks at this amazing facility, after my complete knee replacement. I received very good care, physical therapy was totally above average, the therapist were very competent, caring and supportive on all the ways that were of concern to me. The nursing staff responded quickly and caringly to my needs and to the needs of my roommate. The facility is kept clean and visitors were treated with warmth and respect. Thank you for the great care I was given during my recovery!

  • Thomas Fahey
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I came to this facility following knee replacement surgery. I am impressed by the professionalism, competence, and caring attitude of the staff. They have a comprehensive rehab program that includes physical therapy, occupational therapy, wound management, skilled nursing, assisted living services, and patient activities. The maintenance staff keeps the rooms spotless. The food is good, and they make an effort to accommodate individual tastes. I highly recommend this rehab hospital.

  • Mike Biggs
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Ive worked at 6 different long term facilities and this is by far the best all around : )

  • CELESTE RIX
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

About California Park Rehabilitation Hospital

General Information

Legal Business NameChico Rehabilitation Hospital, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 2, 1995 (25 years)
Capacity90
Residents78
Percent Occupied87%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for California Park Rehabilitation Hospital

California Park Rehabilitation Hospital was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of California Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 14, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

September 8, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$12,326 fine

June 7, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$5,655 fine

July 21, 2015 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$24,188 fine

April 14, 2015 - 5 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$70,550 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of California Park Rehabilitation Hospital require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 15min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
15min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 40min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
50.0%
51.6%
46.9%
32.3%
43.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.3%
24.1%
26.3%
19.7%
18.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
13.7%
33.4%
27.1%
14.2%
15.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.0%
8.5%
7.1%
5.0%
11.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.9%
18.2%
19.6%
5.4%
10.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.2%
2.2%
2.1%
2.0%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
5.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.1%
2.9%
6.1%
1.4%
2.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
5.2%
3.5%
1.6%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.7%
5.1%
7.0%
8.2%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8%
1.5%
1.4%
3.0%
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.4%
99.5%
98.6%
99.0%
87.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.2%
99.5%
99.5%
99.5%
85.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
65.5%
69.7%
65.4%
71.1%
67.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
0.6%
1.6%
3.0%
1.1%
8.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
0.4%
0.3%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places