Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

La Mariposa Care And Rehabilitation Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. California
  3. Fairfield Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • John Sill
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    New administration. Nursing department is 'on point'. Bright and pretty facility inside, location perfect near hospitals. They cared for my dad and he got better quickly and came home.

  • Joiseyboy23
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Ive been in many rehab clinics, this one has a lot of light, and was a good fit for my grandma, recommend it for sure.

  • Henrich Angelo Mercado
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    cool people and nice workers

  • Barbara .Melott
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    The staff has been very kind and caring of my almost 99 year old mother-in-law. She is clean, cared for, well fed, and socializing on a daily basis when she agrees to go into the more public areas outside her room. Although most of the rooms are triples, they usually have only two residents per room. The therapy staff is involved and compassionate and very patient. The Administrator is on site and closely involved in the everyday workings of this exemplary and CLEAN skilled nursing facility. This SNF even SMELLS clean!!

  • Dan R
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    BEWARE The only thing that these guys care about is money. My family took my grandmother there for rehabilitation after surgery on her leg for a severe infection. She was there for less than 24 hours before she went back to the hospital. They didn't change her diaper. They didn't give her medications (she has afib, high blood pressure, and has suffered a stroke). They told us that she didn't want visitors. We showed up anyways and went to see her (past the objections of the staff) and found the horrible shape that she was in. We had to threaten them to get an ambulance there. I wasn't there when this went down, but if I was, I would have called 911 on my cell phone and got the police there as well. We complained to the State and they launched an investigation. The investigation confirmed our complaint and they had sanctions leveied at them. They had their Medicare license revoked among other things. If you take your loved one there, don't expect to see them alive again.

About La Mariposa Care And Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NameSagar, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 11, 1969 ()
Capacity99
Residents62
Percent Occupied63%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityYes
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for La Mariposa Care And Rehabilitation Center

La Mariposa Care And Rehabilitation Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of California Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 18, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionOffer other nutritional food to each resident who will not eat the food served.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionCompletely assess the resident at least every twelve months.

March 24, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that doctors see a resident's plan of care at every visit and make notes about progress and orders in writing.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionTrain all employees on what to do in an emergency, and carry out unannounced staff drills.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.

September 16, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$16,120 fine

October 16, 2015 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 28 days
---Fine$28,400 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of La Mariposa Care And Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 15min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 35min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

94.8%
96.5%
96.5%
96.5%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.1%
90.4%
92.2%
94.7%
96.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
43.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.8%
22.4%
23.9%
21.2%
18.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
9.6%
15.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
6.2%
4.2%
6.2%
5.6%
11.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.8%
11.4%
12.9%
11.1%
10.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.9%
5.8%
3.9%
1.8%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.1%
2.4%
7.0%
7.1%
5.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.3%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
1.9%
5.9%
1.8%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4%
2.5%
1.3%
2.6%
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

90.1%
85.5%
86.0%
91.9%
87.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
86.2%
90.0%
90.0%
90.0%
85.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
40.1%
27.7%
41.0%
47.6%
67.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
9.7%
6.6%
5.7%
9.4%
8.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.8%
2.6%
1.5%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places