Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Manning Gardens Care Center, Inc

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. California
  3. Fresno Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Amanda ybarra
    ★★★★★ 4 weeks ago

    Frist impression makes a difference and I don't like what I seen that no reabilation center that a nursing home how my dad gonna get what he needs if that don't want to help him get up to use the bathroom he had sergary he's not handicap.i feel that he won't get the help to move around so he can get back to feeling himself not helpless. Plus why do they have that place so far out it makes it hard for people to visit family witch don't make it any easier for someone to recover when they used to being around family all the time.

  • Takyra Lopez
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    My mother was in this facility directly leaving the hospital where she couldn't talk, had no quality of life. And manning gardens brought her back to life. Her diet was upgraded. The activities department kept her engaged even though she was a very antisocial person. Overall great facility I would recommend more friends and family to.

  • Virki
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Staff at this facility is really wonderfull. They go above & beyond to meet their resident needs. This facility has more staff available in all three shift compare to the other facilities. They treat the resident & guest with the best care. FRIENDLY FACES & CALM ENVIRONMENT makes you feel WELCOME anytime you go there.?

  • Manreet Dosanjh
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    There's not enough I can say about Manning Gardens. My grandfather stayed here recently and was treated with great care and respect. He speaks of his recovery and says he owes a lot of it to the lovely staff who passionately took care of all his needs. Nurses constantly provided me with updates and were always receptive to any feedback/comments. Manning Gardens is a facility that aims to spreads positivity and I would highly recommend it to anyone that is in need of such a facility.

  • Michelle Redd
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    My father was in this facility directly leaving the hospital where he couldn't talk, had no quality of life. And manning gardens brought him back to life. His diet was upgraded. The activities department kept her engaged even though he was a not very friendly .Overall great facility I would recommend more friends and family to.

About Manning Gardens Care Center, Inc

General Information

Legal Business NameManning Gardens Care Center Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1967 ()
Capacity59
Residents56
Percent Occupied95%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Manning Gardens Care Center, Inc

Manning Gardens Care Center, Inc was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of California Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 24, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide bedrooms that hold no more than 4 residents per room.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.

August 9, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.

June 30, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$13,328 fine
KSomeImmediate JeopardyComplaintHelp and prepare each resident for a safe and easy discharge or transfer from the nursing home.
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide timely notification to the resident before transfer or discharge.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Manning Gardens Care Center, Inc require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 45min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
20min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 45min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

94.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.7%
94.6%
94.1%
97.2%
96.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
56.0%
43.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.0%
18.5%
20.8%
10.0%
18.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
15.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.3%
11.8%
19.4%
18.2%
11.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.1%
7.7%
13.6%
21.4%
10.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
2.8%
0.0%
0.0%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.0%
12.5%
5.0%
8.3%
5.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
5.3%
2.5%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.1%
2.8%
3.0%
2.9%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.9%
2.7%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6%
1.6%
1.8%
3.2%
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

64.2%
66.2%
77.4%
83.2%
87.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
72.0%
77.7%
77.7%
77.7%
85.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
42.3%
44.6%
56.0%
74.1%
67.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
30.7%
27.3%
36.7%
22.4%
8.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.7%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places