Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Wolf Creek Care Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. California (CA)
  4. Grass Valley
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 5.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Voluptuous Donna
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    I am here recovering from extensive total hip surgery. From the moment I arrived i noticed a overall home feeling. I have never felt so at home anywhere like Wolf Creek Care Center besides my own home of course. Every person that works here is absolutely wonderful. I could go on and on but I will finish my review to say that if I could give each and every one that works here 10 stars I would. AND the food is amazing! God bless every one at Wolf Creek.

  • Sharon Serene
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I would choose Wolf Creek Care Center above all others for my loved ones. I have been told that wonderful things come in small packages and this is certainly true with this small facility. The nursing staff is excellent, and truly cares about the welfare of their residents, they are also very considerate of the residents families and try to accommodate visiting hours, guest meals with loved ones, or accommodations if a family wants to have a special party or family gathering. The therapy department goes that extra mile to assure all residents are the best they can be before discharging from the facility. I would highly recommend this facility.

  • Isaac Simmons
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I cannot say enough good things about this facility. The staff was attentive to my dad's needs and they were able to make time to answer my questions regarding his care. My dad had a lot of skin issues from a facility that he was previously at and needed a contraption called a wound-vac in order to heal a complex wound. The wound care doctor took the time to explain the benefits of the wound-vac, the nurse took the time explain the process of putting it on and gave me weekly updates about the progress. The wound was eventually healed sooner than expected and he was able to come home without any skin problems. I had never expected so much communication between myself and the facility, but it provided unprecedented peace of mind.

  • Johnaleen Castro
    ★★★★★ a year ago

  • A Google User
    ★★★★★ 6 years ago

About Wolf Creek Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameBluebell Holdings, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1967 ()
Capacity59
Residents56
Percent Occupied95%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Wolf Creek Care Center

Wolf Creek Care Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of California Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 5, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

October 15, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

March 23, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintGive the right treatment and services to residents who display physical or psychosocial problems adapting to changes in circumstances.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Wolf Creek Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
25min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 15min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 5min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

91.1%
95.5%
95.5%
95.5%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
97.5%
97.7%
100.0%
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
40.9%
40.0%
33.3%
42.9%
44.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.0%
39.5%
35.7%
33.3%
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
11.5%
6.3%
17.8%
17.1%
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.8%
15.8%
14.6%
15.4%
12.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.4%
2.7%
12.2%
21.6%
10.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3%
2.4%
0.0%
2.5%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.0%
5.1%
0.0%
5.0%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.1%
9.5%
12.0%
4.0%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
5.0%
5.4%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.5%
2.9%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4%
2.5%
2.3%
2.4%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
2.1%
1.9%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.4%
95.6%
89.8%
85.6%
83.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
54.7%
92.3%
92.3%
92.3%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.3%
66.8%
71.6%
71.4%
61.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
9.0%
5.5%
4.5%
3.1%
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places