Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Regents Point - Windcrest

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. California (CA)
  4. Irvine
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    My husband and I looked at 7 different facilities. Regents Point was number 7 and we knew we found the right place. The staff is courteous, accommodating, and kind. The residents are welcoming and engage in interesting conversation. We are very happy here in independent living in our mid-sized villa. The continuing care facilities are managed professionally and I will not hesitate to move to that level if I need that care.

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    My wife and I moved to Regents Point a little over two years ago. We knew that we were going to a very nice facility located near the UCI campus where we could easily walk to the shops that support the campus. What we didn't know was that we had a large group of friends that we had not yet met. We a happy here and glad we made the move. We are part of a fairly large group of residents who visit and do other volunteer work at the assisted living and full scale nursing facilities on campus. In total about 20,000 hours volunteer work is provided each year. So those people who go to higher level of care than independent living get good professional care plus the equivalent of about 10 extra people who do volunteer work. I submitted this review because I have been so impressed with the programs I see (when I am doing volunteer work there) being offered to the residents in the assisted living portion of Regents Point (Sunridge). jk

  • ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    This is a first rate facility and the staff is the best ever. Moved my mom here after being in another facility and the difference is like night and day. We met a lady here that worked here for 27yrs and has come back to live here now. As she told me, ''I loved this place so much I wanted to come back and live here''.. that alone says alot . Only facility in Orange County has has a full time registered nursing staff. Highly recommended ..you will not be disappointed.

  • ★★★★★ 5 years ago

    Ego ego.. staff are not a team player.. and the residents suffer.. the bathroom shower are not fit to the residents who suffer a lot...

  • ★★★★★ 10 months ago

About Regents Point - Windcrest

General Information

Legal Business NameSouthern California Presbyterian Homes
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 4, 1988 (30 years)
Capacity59
Residents50
Percent Occupied85%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Regents Point - Windcrest

Regents Point - Windcrest
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of California Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 5, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.

August 26, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTrain all employees on what to do in an emergency, and carry out unannounced staff drills.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive proper treatment to residents with feeding tubes to prevent problems (such as aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, nasal-pharyngeal ulcers) and help restore eating skills, if possible.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Regents Point - Windcrest require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 60min
2hr 45min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 35min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.8%
97.6%
97.6%
97.6%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.3%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
44.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.1%
22.6%
27.3%
23.5%
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.4%
7.9%
11.9%
15.4%
12.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.0%
0.0%
3.2%
11.8%
10.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
3.5%
3.3%
5.5%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.9%
10.5%
7.3%
5.1%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.0%
0.0%
13.2%
5.3%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9%
5.3%
9.8%
7.7%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.4%
2.6%
2.4%
5.1%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.0%
6.7%
3.6%
1.8%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.1%
98.4%
96.6%
91.5%
83.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.5%
90.0%
90.0%
90.0%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
44.9%
32.9%
42.3%
39.3%
61.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
5.3%
16.0%
12.8%
6.2%
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places