Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Crenshaw Nursing Home

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. California (CA)
  4. Los Angeles
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Crenshaw Nursing Home

General Information

Legal Business NameCrenshaw Enterprises, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 6, 1967 ()
Capacity55
Residents52
Percent Occupied95%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Crenshaw Nursing Home

Crenshaw Nursing Home
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
* Data not availableStaff Rating
* Data not availableRN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of California Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 13, 2016 - 8 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that doctors see a resident's plan of care at every visit and make notes about progress and orders in writing.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.

September 26, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a detailed, written plan for disasters and emergencies, such as fire, severe weather, and missing residents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionTrain all employees on what to do in an emergency, and carry out unannounced staff drills.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Data Not Available

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.2%
80.0%
80.0%
80.0%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.1%
63.0%
63.8%
69.6%
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
28.6%
38.5%
43.5%
37.5%
44.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.3%
28.3%
32.6%
26.1%
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
4.5%
5.4%
4.1%
8.4%
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
12.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.3%
2.3%
2.4%
4.7%
10.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
2.2%
4.3%
0.0%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
3.8%
3.7%
0.0%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4%
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

2.1%
4.9%
0.0%
15.6%
83.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
12.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
61.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
4.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened