Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

St Pauls Towers

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. California
  3. Oakland Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Nancy DeLoach
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    My father spent a month on the skilled nursing floor after having open heart surgery. I was a regular visitor - almost daily. Every staff member that I came in contact with was pleasant and genuinely cared about my father's well being. This place goes above and beyond based on my experiences with other similar facilities.

  • Shivaun Nestor
    ★★★★★ 4 years ago

    When we moved my mother up here from Arizona and were looking for a retirement community in the East Bay, this was hands down the best. Unlike other facilities that we visited, there was an air of vibrancy the minute that you entered; even people who were using walkers were energetic and engaged. Residents take an active role in running the facility. The food is very good. Not what one would expect in an institution, copious amounts of fresh produce and cooked-from scratch entrees are always available. I like my mother's doctor (onsite) very much, and feel that overall, she has access to excellent health care (a big concern on our part). Before moving to St. Paul's, my mother had been living in a continuing care facility in Prescott, Arizona, that allowed her to isolate herself after my stepfather's death from Alzheimer's. In addition, most of her close friends had moved away to be closer to their children. We were concerned when she moved up here that she would continue to isolate herself, despite coming over weekly for family dinner every Sunday. However, in addition to providing regular arts and exercise programming, at St. Paul's the meals and events are designed to encourage socialization - it's a community that doesn't allow one to isolate oneself. My mother has made several good friends there over the past three years, and is far more lively and engaged than she was before she moved here. I could not be happier. It is expensive, but if you can afford it, the price is more than worth it - at least it was for us, as I have seen my mother blossom there!

  • Daniel Wylie
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    I have relatives living here and am very impressed with the facilities. Very well maintained building with comfortable apartments. Food is very good and the employees are polite and helpful.

  • Frank Moyer
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

  • Josh Cohen
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

About St Pauls Towers

General Information

Legal Business NameEpiscopal Senior Communities
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 9, 1972 (47 years)
Capacity43
Residents38
Percent Occupied88%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for St Pauls Towers

St Pauls Towers was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of California Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 7, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of St Pauls Towers require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 45min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 10min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 45min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
75.0%
75.0%
75.0%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.8%
95.7%
88.5%
86.2%
96.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
43.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
0.0%
4.8%
4.2%
4.2%
18.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
4.6%
-
61.4%
-
15.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.8%
17.4%
19.2%
24.1%
11.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.1%
-
30.4%
22.7%
10.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.5%
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.7%
17.8%
3.3%
5.4%
2.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.3%
0.0%
4.0%
0.0%
5.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
4.3%
0.0%
10.3%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12.5%
17.4%
26.9%
20.7%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2%
0.0%
7.7%
3.4%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

85.7%
92.6%
92.2%
84.8%
87.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.2%
66.7%
66.7%
65.5%
85.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.8%
55.2%
46.9%
-
67.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
17.5%
16.7%
17.0%
10.0%
8.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places