Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Sierra View Homes

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. California (CA)
  4. Reedley
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I love this place! Not because I work there, but because 5 years ago I went searching for a place for my parents to live. That's when I found Sierra View Homes Retirement Community. My Step Mom lived in both Residential Care and Skilled Nursing. With my Father living in an Independent Living Apartment it was easy for him to visit her daily. I'm so blessed that they were there for my family in her final years. They provided her a great place to live, and they treated her with respect and dignity she deserved.

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I have worked as a consultant for multiple retirement communities, and have worked with this community for close to five years now. As an outsider looking in, I have been consistently impressed by the resident-focus of the staff, and the way they love the people that live at Sierra View. They emphasize that "this is a ministry for people - it isn't about money." Even so, their wise and responsible fiscal management has caused other communities to come to them for advice. They are wise stewards, using their resources to bless seniors and the Reedley community, and it shows.

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I am proud to be part of this 5-star all-inclusive care community. The Sierra View staff and community is dedicated to maximize the quality and enjoyment of the lives it serves.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Executive Director Vito Genna and his staff have no regard for medical ethics or state/federal law. They dislike families who advocate for their loved ones, and will use intimidation to try to silence them. Do your loved one a favor and choose another home.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    They have really great staff members. Staff members understand residents . They are a great place . They have 24 hour care and apartments if residents are able to live by Self. They also care about there residents . They have great food . Have a lot of fund raisers . Residents also get to go on many field trips. Family members can vist and stay to have lunch or dinner . They also have church on sundays for residents . I would recommend this place for anybody.

About Sierra View Homes

General Information

Legal Business NameSierra View Homes
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 1, 1971 (47 years)
Capacity59
Residents59
Percent Occupied100%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Sierra View Homes

Sierra View Homes
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of California Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 30, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

October 23, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Sierra View Homes require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 10min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
63.6%
72.0%
67.9%
44.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
6.4%
3.9%
11.5%
14.3%
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
10.8%
0.0%
11.7%
16.0%
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.4%
15.7%
13.7%
10.0%
12.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.7%
4.7%
20.0%
9.8%
10.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
6.2%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1%
4.0%
16.3%
11.8%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
11.3%
11.1%
6.4%
5.3%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.3%
83.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.8%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
62.4%
56.7%
-
-
61.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
0.0%
0.0%
3.7%
3.8%
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.9%
3.6%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places