Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. California (CA)
  4. Roseville
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Cindy Logan
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    My mom fell at home and nearly passed away. After a few quick days in the hospital, the doctor said she needed some more time to recover. He recommended Roseville Point. Taking her there was the best decision we made. They are so friendly and compassionate and took amazing care of my mother. Everyone there was happy, and the room and bathrooms were super clean. My mom loved the food, which she never does, and left so much healthier! I can't thank the team at Roseville Point enough! I would recommend them to everyone!!

  • Melissa Donovan
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    My mom stayed at this facility recently. I have never written an online review before, and I am specifically going out of my way now to do so because this place really deserves it. First off... Note that I am a very particular person, that pays close attention to detail and all, so it is a big deal that I am taking the time to do this review. I would like to put my honest opinion out there so that the next person that reads this review doesn't feel as weary about this facility as I did at first researching online. My mom was in the hospital due to falling when we were out running errands--causing her to injure herself drastically. The casemanagers at the hospital and doctor recommended for my mom to go to a skilled nursing facility, though we had never been to one before, we decided it was for the best in order for her to recover and get some therapy. I did my research online like many others, and the hospital did provide me with a list of locations for me to look into. I was unsure about Roseville Point due to the low ratings it had online, but I decided to check it out since they did have a couple good ones. Let me tell you, when I walked into the building I was surprised by how nice it was, clean, smelt fresh, the staff was SO genuinely friendly. I was quickly assisted and given a tour. I was able to speak to some of the family members who told me great things about the facility and the patients seemed happy. Overall, I decided to give Roseville Point an opportunity. I was very pleased with my mom's stay. She recovered quickly, she was happy, the staff is so friendly and CARING. They make you feel welcome, and accommodate to your particular needs. Every time we had a concern we addressed it and someone was always ready to direct us into the correct department or find an answer, or solve it themselves if they could. The only complaint I have is the wait times when my mom would press her call button. However, we understood that of course there are other patients who need assistance as well. Like I said, sometimes it did take a little bit longer to wait for assistance but from what I have heard from others that's a typical characteristic of nursing homes. I made their Administrator aware of it, and he took note and I was told it is something they are constantly working to improve on. I would like to make clear, that though I dock them a star for it; once they do get to you, they give you exceptional service and never made my mother feel rushed. Hopefully we don't have to come back to a nursing home for a long time... but if we did, we would DEFINITELY come back to Roseville Point. YES WOULD RECOMMEND!!!

  • Darlene
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    This place is above and beyond all the staff are great they have a good team from nursing dept to rehab and the office.. 5 star facility

  • Sheryl Scheeper
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Roseville Pointe provided excellent rehab and nursing care to my 94 yr old father after a stroke. As an advanced practice nurse, it's difficult to provide care that is sufficient with my expectations but Roseville Pointe did just that for my father. After four weeks he was strong enough to come home. Thank you to Roseville Pointe for quality caring and compassionate care.

  • Dawn Anderson
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    My dad was here for 4 days. They let him get so dehydrated that his kidneys shut down and he had to be rushed to the hospital. He ended up in icu for a week and came close to dying. When we went to collect his belongings, they returned none of his clothing we had taken. I would think twice before I put a loved one here.

About Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center

General Information

Legal Business NameRoseville Point Health & Wellness Center LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 22, 1969 ()
Capacity98
Residents80
Percent Occupied82%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center

Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of California Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 7, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

June 19, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProtect each resident from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of personal property.

April 10, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 40min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 25min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
53.6%
62.1%
51.9%
44.4%
44.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.5%
17.7%
11.5%
18.0%
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
31.1%
37.7%
32.7%
31.2%
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.0%
5.2%
5.5%
3.6%
12.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.8%
16.0%
7.5%
14.5%
10.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.9%
6.5%
3.1%
4.8%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.6%
2.0%
0.0%
6.4%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.0%
3.2%
4.7%
1.6%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.5%
3.1%
3.1%
1.5%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.7%
6.7%
3.0%
7.1%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.5%
98.8%
99.0%
99.0%
83.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.4%
95.1%
95.1%
95.1%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.3%
76.1%
76.3%
68.7%
61.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
0.0%
0.9%
0.7%
1.9%
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places