Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Mckinley Park Care Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. California (CA)
  4. Sacramento
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • david dix
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I was hospitalized at Kaiser Permanente south from a bad motorcycle accident and after some time they sent me here for an "advanced care facility." Looked great at first but it was a rough start. Jeff made things astronomically better immediately. physical therapy was top notch specifically mike! Thanks for your help. Food sucks though!!! Seriously

  • Oscar Reynon
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    I cannot thank you enough for taking care of me while I am in the facility. keep up the good work. Everyone did an excellent job. Thank you so much

  • patrick blackshire
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    The staff is sweet it has been remodeled flat screens touch screens. I heard the food is good.

  • Jamal Patton
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I wish I could give this dump negative stars! It breaks my heart when I think about how I left my father here for two days (because Mercy discharged him from the Hospital, leaving us 45 minutes to choose a facility that I didn't even have time to go look at it). I should have followed my gut when I first walked in. The facility is filthy, dark, stuffy, terrible lighting, and reeks of cigarette smoke. My father, who was on oxygen at the time, informed me that his roommate was smoking outside of the room (in a non-designated smoking area) of course causing smoke to come into the room. Where were the nurses when this was happening? Come to find out that my father sat in his own feces over night. The nurses were not on top of his medication (every nurse had a different story why he didn't receive his medication on time) and brought him a smashed peanut butter and jelly sandwich for dinner on his first night, I'm LIVID just thinking about it!!! My father was only there for physical therapy rehabilitation, I feel even worse for those who are there for long-term care. After 2 days (I still can't forgive myself) I pulled my father out of McKinley and placed him at Eskaton Village on Walnut Ave. What a complete difference! Eskaton Village on Walnut Ave. is beautiful, clean and has amazing staff. When my father fully recovers and I have the strength and time, I will be escalating this issue as high as I can go. The photos on yelp are a joke. The place looks nothing like the photos! DO NOT TAKE YOUR LOVED ONES HERE!!! YOU WILL REGRET IT! I am so sad that my father had to experience this.

  • George L Parrott
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    No coordination of staff. Very poor antiquated rooms. Latency to respond to call button usually over 30 minutes. Slightly better than being homeless. Slightly. Front office staff totally unresponsive once admitted.

About Mckinley Park Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameAzalea Holdings, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 17, 1979 (38 years)
Capacity86
Residents77
Percent Occupied90%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Mckinley Park Care Center

Mckinley Park Care Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of California Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 17, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.

April 18, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

January 8, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.

February 13, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep all essential equipment working safely.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.

December 3, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Mckinley Park Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr
1hr 30min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
4hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

90.7%
91.7%
91.7%
91.7%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
44.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.4%
13.2%
19.5%
13.5%
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
11.0%
26.4%
14.2%
-
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
2.8%
2.9%
7.9%
6.1%
12.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
2.5%
2.7%
10.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.8%
5.3%
4.9%
5.9%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
3.4%
3.3%
0.0%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.1%
10.5%
7.3%
2.9%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9%
2.5%
4.3%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

92.2%
93.7%
94.8%
94.6%
83.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
81.7%
88.2%
88.2%
88.2%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
41.5%
42.1%
51.5%
53.1%
61.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
7.6%
5.7%
7.9%
4.0%
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.9%
0.9%
1.5%
1.0%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places