Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

California Pacific Medical Ctr - St. Luke's Campus

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. California (CA)
  4. San Francisco
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • A Google User
    ★★★★★ 6 years ago

    They're curing people all the time!

  • Mariaelena solorzano. Pena
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Haciendole un ultrasonido. A mi suegra.

  • Jasmine Howard
    ★★★★★ a year ago

  • Christian Sotto
    ★★★★★ 6 years ago

  • ALFRED ZULOAGA
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

About California Pacific Medical Ctr - St. Luke's Campus

General Information

Legal Business NameSutter Bay Hospitals
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJune 13, 1986 (31 years)
Capacity79
Residents56
Percent Occupied71%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalYes
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for California Pacific Medical Ctr - St. Luke's Campus

California Pacific Medical Ctr - St. Luke's Campus
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of California Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 12, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTrain all employees on what to do in an emergency, and carry out unannounced staff drills.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

September 25, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

December 19, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep all essential equipment working safely.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of California Pacific Medical Ctr - St. Luke's Campus require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 25min
2hr 45min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 55min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
LPN
2hr 50min
1hr 55min
ReportedExpected
RN
8hr 10min
5hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 3hr 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
97.1%
97.1%
97.1%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
91.7%
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
44.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.2%
25.0%
18.2%
19.4%
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
6.2%
3.1%
3.0%
0.0%
12.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
10.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.1%
3.2%
18.2%
13.9%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
14.3%
24.0%
22.2%
25.8%
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12.9%
9.4%
21.2%
16.7%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
36.2%
19.9%
13.8%
25.8%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1%
6.2%
3.0%
5.6%
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

80.3%
85.8%
81.0%
77.1%
83.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.2%
90.0%
90.0%
90.0%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
41.0%
49.0%
51.4%
46.2%
61.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
31.6%
29.3%
25.8%
33.5%
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.2%
0.8%
1.4%
1.4%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
0.0%
0.4%
0.8%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places