Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

White Blossom Care Center

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. California
  3. San Jose Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Sheri
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    My dad spent several weeks, on two different occasions, at White Blossom Care Center. We were very pleased with the excellent care he received by the numerous staff members we met. They exceeded our expectations. Special recognition goes to Bella, one of the CNA's. We wouldn't hesitate to recommend White Blossom to anyone needing rehab. Even the food was good.

  • Ethan Frost
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    White Blossom has been a blessing to our family. The staff are very friendly, and the grounds are very well groomed. The flowers they place for the residents and guests always cheer you up. Highly recommend this facility.

  • Morgan Newby
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    We looked into White Blossom for a family member and were amazed by service we received from Destiny and the whole admissions team! It is easy to see they truly care about their patients and patients family members during the stressful time of rehab. Would definitely recommend White Blossom to anyone!

  • Gold Bee
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    I can't say good things about their staff. Compassionate, dedicated, and no matter what time of day I popped in, they were treating my dad like a family member. Savannah is so amazing I wish she could be cloned and able to care for everyone's sick folks 24/7 /365. Friendly at the front desk, smiles and pleasant attitudes and wonderful employees front to back. Whatever they make, it is not enough! The only thing I wish I could change is proximity to Valley Med. Sketchy area. I wish the front had a security guard 24/7 and that there would be a sign in sheet to visit.

  • Fanny Alexander's
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    These 5 stars are for the outstanding staff (mostly) like Laurie, and Savannah (nurse) and many cna staff, that go above and beyond for patients and their families. Most of the nurses and CNAs are kind and compassionate. Overall they treat patients very well. The place is clean. On the downside, the food is low in quality protein, fresh veggies and fruit. The average meal is way too high in refined carbs.

About White Blossom Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameHawthorne Holdings, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 1, 1977 (43 years)
Capacity153
Residents146
Percent Occupied95%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for White Blossom Care Center

White Blossom Care Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of California Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 21, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

July 14, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

June 27, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide written records when a resident is transferred or discharged.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of White Blossom Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 55min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 55min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

93.1%
87.6%
87.6%
87.6%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
99.0%
97.8%
98.9%
96.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
55.9%
52.0%
38.1%
66.7%
43.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.4%
11.6%
9.3%
9.5%
18.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
24.5%
31.8%
26.6%
12.5%
15.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.8%
8.8%
11.0%
13.3%
11.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.1%
18.5%
12.2%
6.2%
10.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.5%
9.7%
19.5%
12.2%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.4%
3.7%
4.0%
6.1%
5.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
11.8%
12.2%
4.8%
4.2%
2.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.8%
3.2%
0.0%
2.2%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8%
2.7%
0.9%
0.0%
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

94.6%
96.0%
95.7%
96.5%
87.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
82.4%
91.9%
91.9%
91.9%
85.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
54.1%
64.3%
70.4%
62.8%
67.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
11.2%
13.7%
15.4%
11.7%
8.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1%
2.0%
1.2%
0.9%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.2%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places