Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Spring Lake Village

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. California
  3. Santa Rosa Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Kiki Dee
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Add our names to huge fans of SLV -a beautiful "resort" for seniors. There is a Long Wait list, for obvious reasons. So many wonderful programs and it attracts interesting people. Soem Residnets are concerend: Seems to be challenges with hiring management and getting staff. We happily visit good friends there....we are impressed every time.

  • Tony Cathirell
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    Outstanding community as we have my wife's parents staying here. The staff here is wonderful and all the amenities that you could ever have for your loved ones is right here. Gorgeous views with a restaraunt that serves outstanding food. The grounds are always very well maintained and the security is top notch. This is definitely a place I wish more average hard working retired people could afford. I would recommend to any body if you have parents to look into this place.

  • Pat Cummings
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    This retirement community is absolutely gorgeous! Main building hosts two restaurant-style dining areas on either side of a stunning engave/indoor garden. While I was visiting, I saw 18 residents being driven in golf-carts or taken on longer drives in cars. Someone REALLY thought about what was needed to supply a gracious retirement lifestyle...

  • Renny Sherrow
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    A great place for retirement and lovely for visitors. All one needs and more to enjoy a full life.

  • alntech
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    A very clean, nice, housing complex located right by Spring lake Park.

About Spring Lake Village

General Information

Legal Business NameEpiscopal Senior Communities
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 4, 1986 (33 years)
Capacity70
Residents53
Percent Occupied76%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Spring Lake Village

Spring Lake Village was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of California Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 17, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Spring Lake Village require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 10min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 10min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 10min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.2%
94.7%
94.7%
94.7%
95.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
60.0%
-
-
-
43.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.3%
12.1%
16.1%
18.2%
18.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
9.4%
12.2%
13.4%
14.3%
15.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.8%
11.1%
14.7%
16.7%
11.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.7%
12.1%
16.1%
6.1%
10.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.1%
11.1%
8.8%
5.7%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
3.0%
0.0%
6.5%
5.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
8.8%
3.9%
2.5%
5.0%
2.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
2.8%
2.9%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.7%
2.8%
2.9%
0.0%
2.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
2.8%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.6%
2.6%
2.3%
5.2%
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.6%
98.3%
97.8%
97.3%
87.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.5%
94.9%
94.9%
94.9%
85.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.3%
65.9%
67.5%
70.1%
67.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
18.5%
22.4%
29.5%
28.4%
8.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.6%
0.0%
0.7%
0.7%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
0.4%
1.7%
2.3%
0.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017CA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places