Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Sonoma Valley Hospital Dp/Snf

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. California (CA)
  4. Sonoma
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    Over $7,000 for an IV for heat exhaustion. SEVEN. THOUSAND. DOLLARS. This is UTTERLY deplorable. And there's no way for me to make a financial evaluation without having the treatment first. And your nurse needs a machine to find a vein becaaaaauuusseee??? Oh right. So you can charge me $500 bucks for it. You're part of the problem.

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    I went to Sonoma valley hospital on march. I was going for heart problems or possibly a heart attack. I had asked C. Sanders to check on my insurance since I was unsure if it was active that month or the previous month. Ms. C. Sanders stated I was good to go and helped me into the back. Once in the back a Dr. by the name of hishimoto Greg looked at me and placed a stethoscope and stated that based on my age sex, and ethnicity I was having a panic attack. Mr. H failed to do an EKG or any pertinent blood work. He gave me Ativan! A medication used for panic attack. Before leaving Ms. Sanders comes back and has me sing a form that according to her was to cover what ever my insurance didn't cover. I was lied to! For that I was stuck with a $1377.66 bill from Sonoma valley hospital. I took a day of work to talk to someone of the misunderstanding and that I was told differently about my insurance. It came in and out the ear of Cynthia D. Did absolutely nothing to remedy their mistakes. Her assistant by the name of Jessica Pratt was the worst, not only did she not help, she was rude! She stated she would send me a form to fill out to see if I qualified for charity money! I did the form and never received a call back from Cynthia or Jessica. The following day I went to a kaiser ER, there I had an EKG and blood work and found something medically wrong with my heart. If you care about your family or yourself in general and don't want to be lied to and taken advantage of DO NOT GO to Sonoma Valley Hospital beyond the worst experience ever.

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Had a great experience with the ED. I went straight back to the room and they addressed my tachycardia promptly. I'm glad to come here for treatment.

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Have never had a good experience at this hospital. I have heard testimony from several locals who feel the same.

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I was born at this hospital :-)

About Sonoma Valley Hospital Dp/Snf

General Information

Legal Business NameSonoma Valley Health Care District
Ownership TypeGovernment - Hospital District
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 19, 1986 (31 years)
Capacity27
Residents19
Percent Occupied70%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalYes
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Sonoma Valley Hospital Dp/Snf

Sonoma Valley Hospital Dp/Snf
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of California Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 6, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

November 19, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

May 20, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Sonoma Valley Hospital Dp/Snf require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

4hr 60min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA

45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
5hr 15min
1hr 30min
ReportedExpected
RN
10hr 15min
4hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 7hr 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
44.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
15.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
12.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
10.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
4.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
5.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
-
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
-
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
-
0.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.5%
97.8%
97.2%
97.2%
83.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.8%
97.8%
97.8%
97.8%
81.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
46.9%
45.0%
44.8%
49.6%
61.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
28.0%
29.5%
26.2%
28.2%
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.0%
2.2%
3.8%
2.3%
1.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.4%
2.2%
1.6%
0.6%
0.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places