Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Beth Israel At Shalom Park

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Colorado (CO)
  4. Aurora
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Eric Nelson
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    My mother has lived at Shalom Park since July 2015. She went there after living with my spouse and I for almost 8 years, at the age of 93. She had fallen a few times in our home and it was no longer safe for her to be with us. I searched many places and was unable to find anywhere nearly as good as Shalom Park. Mom is now 95 and enjoys using their 90 degree heated pool (with assistance of course) approximately 3 times per week. It helps her legs remain as strong as possible, and she rarely complains of arthritis pain any longer. She sings in the choir and attends the many activities there as she chooses. I have actually seen her become less frail since moving in to Shalom. Shalom is kept quite clean, and mom says the food is mostly good. They really strive to make it the resident's "home" and are very respectful of the residents and family members. The Director of Nursing and Nursing Home Administrator respond to any e-mail / phone call issues or concerns I have very quickly. Any time a health issue arises, they are on it very quickly. There are many caring people who work and volunteer there. My experience has been and continues to be very positive.

  • Marilyn Bogan
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    My Dad lived at Shalom Park for 2 years. The care he received was excellent, and he enjoyed life as much as possible considering his decline. And the staff was very supportive and helpful to me and my family.

  • ansel k
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    They have been super nice to my grandmother. Great staff!

  • sherrbear
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    I had a horrible experience there as well. When asking the social worker to re-evaluate my mother after 2 years, I was told they rely on the nursing staff to let them know if there are problems. I was told that her cats/plants are still alive- she is fine-hasn't changed a bit. I moved her out of there the next week.

  • John Vcelka
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Excellent facility. Accessible workout equipment and a warm water pool with lazy river and lap lanes

About Beth Israel At Shalom Park

General Information

Legal Business NameShalom Park
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 8, 1992 (25 years)
Capacity135
Residents124
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Beth Israel At Shalom Park

Beth Israel At Shalom Park
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Colorado Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 4, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

September 30, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$6,338 fine
KSomeImmediate JeopardyHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Review the work of each nurse aide every year; and 2) give regular in-service training based upon these reviews.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain their vision and hearing.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Beth Israel At Shalom Park require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 15min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
5min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
20min
50min
ReportedExpected
RN
1hr 40min
3hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.7%
92.1%
92.1%
92.1%
92.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
64.8%
77.8%
81.2%
88.4%
89.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
59.1%
55.0%
54.7%
52.8%
48.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.0%
8.6%
12.1%
14.3%
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
25.4%
16.2%
15.0%
14.2%
17.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.5%
6.0%
6.0%
6.2%
14.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.2%
18.6%
12.4%
22.7%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.9%
12.1%
15.3%
12.5%
9.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.0%
7.8%
6.8%
8.5%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.0%
3.5%
1.1%
1.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
4.3%
0.9%
0.8%
4.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.0%
3.4%
2.6%
5.4%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.0%
2.6%
2.6%
3.9%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.0%
0.8%
0.8%
0.7%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

58.3%
62.5%
56.4%
-
75.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
74.3%
84.2%
84.2%
84.2%
74.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
65.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
11.5%
12.0%
-
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
0.0%
0.0%
-
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.0%
2.6%
2.1%
-
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places