Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Julia Temple Healthcare Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Colorado (CO)
  4. Englewood
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Dawn Toivonen
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    This place was terrible. They lost my dad's glasses, a pair of jeans a belt, 2 pairs of sweats pants. When I visited him he had on clothes other then what I brought. When I ask where his clothes were that I brought then couldn't give me an answer. Then when I ask where his glasses were they said they didn't know. I was very disappointed with this place and would not recommend it to anyone

  • Art Simon
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    The "skilled nursing facility" at Julia Temple is not a good place for anyone. I encourage you to please make a different choice for the people you care for. After 3 days I was just grateful to get my loved one out alive.

  • TINA LONG
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    As hard as it is for anyone to have a loved one in a 'nursing' home-I believe they do a phenominal job at Julia Temple. Staff is amazing and everyone really seems to care!

  • mylyingeyes
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Hated this place, just like all the rest of them. Doctors, nurses, admin all will lie to you. They are in business to get government/taxpayer money, that is all. Take your loved ones somewhere else, please.

  • Norah Hendershot
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    December 9th our sister, had Deep Brain Stimulation surgery and she needed follow up care in Denver. We had no idea where she would receive this care until we learned that Julia Temple Healthcare Center would provide it, starting Dec. 10th. After googling JT, I was apprehensive as the other four reviews were so negative. But our experience with JT was all positive. We found them to be caring and considerate and so attentive to my sister. She was in their care for 17 days. The rehabilitation care was so good for her. All of the staff that we met at JT were kind and very professional. They even consulted with the assisted living in Pueblo where she lives to make sure they have the physical therapy she needs. We recommend them highly.

About Julia Temple Healthcare Center

General Information

Legal Business NameChateau Julia Healthcare, Inc.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 15, 1994 (24 years)
Capacity128
Residents112
Percent Occupied88%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Julia Temple Healthcare Center

Julia Temple Healthcare Center was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Colorado Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 7, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.

April 8, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

August 19, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 19 days
---Fine$6,338 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Julia Temple Healthcare Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 40min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
25min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 55min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.1%
91.8%
91.8%
91.8%
92.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
99.0%
99.0%
89.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
48.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.1%
9.4%
11.3%
10.6%
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
13.5%
17.1%
14.4%
23.5%
17.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.6%
16.3%
16.3%
14.7%
14.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.4%
28.0%
12.1%
12.2%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
3.4%
0.0%
9.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.0%
9.9%
13.3%
8.4%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.0%
7.6%
11.7%
7.4%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.1%
1.0%
4.1%
0.0%
4.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
2.0%
1.0%
0.0%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
2.0%
2.0%
2.1%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

78.2%
79.2%
72.8%
66.2%
75.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.9%
77.6%
77.6%
77.6%
74.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
62.9%
71.7%
61.0%
62.9%
65.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
7.9%
10.0%
12.0%
11.0%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.5%
1.3%
1.2%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
2.1%
1.4%
0.8%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places