Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Valley View Villa

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Colorado (CO)
  4. Fort Morgan
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:
Other Nearby Nursing Homes
Sunset Manor
Brush, CO
8 miles
Eben Ezer Lutheran Care Center
Brush, CO
8 miles

About Valley View Villa

General Information

Legal Business NameConsolidated Resources Health Care Fund I, L.P.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1990 (28 years)
Capacity120
Residents66
Percent Occupied55%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Valley View Villa

Valley View Villa
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Colorado Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 20, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a detailed, written plan for disasters and emergencies, such as fire, severe weather, and missing residents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that residents receive treatments/services to maintain or improve their ability to care for themselves.

December 4, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that residents receive treatments/services to maintain or improve their ability to care for themselves.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Valley View Villa require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 60min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 10min
55min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
3hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.3%
98.2%
98.2%
98.2%
92.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
98.1%
100.0%
100.0%
89.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
48.8%
41.0%
52.6%
44.1%
48.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
7.5%
18.2%
15.4%
8.2%
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
3.9%
3.9%
9.7%
13.8%
17.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.0%
7.7%
6.0%
4.2%
14.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.6%
13.0%
13.7%
8.2%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.4%
15.3%
5.2%
9.4%
9.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.8%
3.8%
11.8%
6.0%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.9%
1.9%
2.0%
6.0%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8%
5.6%
3.8%
4.0%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

93.2%
88.8%
92.4%
97.3%
75.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.4%
91.2%
91.2%
91.2%
74.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.8%
85.3%
75.9%
70.2%
65.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
14.9%
19.1%
20.6%
20.7%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened