Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Mantey Heights Rehabilitation And Care Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Colorado (CO)
  4. Grand Junction
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Kim Carney
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    I am very disappointed to read the other reviews of this facility. My mother has lived there almost 7 months. About a month ago, she had blood clots go to her lungs, which stopped her heart. The nursing team at Mantey Heights rushed to her aid, gave her CPR and REVIVED her with no heart or brain damage & no broken ribs. If it weren't for these incredibly dedicated & knowledgeable people, I would be grieving the loss of my mother right now, instead of preparing to celebrate Christmas with her. I have found the ENTIRE staff - Nursing, Housekeeping, Activities, Dietary, Administration, PT/OT - nothing but kind, courteous, respectful & dedicated to making the safety, comfort & happiness of their residents their number one priority.

  • Lisa Ellingboe
    ★★★★★ 4 years ago

    My 103 year old grandmother was recently sent to Mantey Heights to recover from a broken leg.. She was expected to have full recovery once she could put her weight on that leg. While her stay at Mantey Heights Rehabilitation Care Center, she got a bed sore.. That was not taken care of.. She also had a bad infection in her good leg which was ignored by the staff. She was taken to Community Hospital last night and they discovered not only did she have a UTI that was not diagnosed but she had gotten staff infection at Mantey Heights. My grandmother is now being moved to hospice. Im so angry and upset with the care she received at this facility. If you have loved ones at Mantey Heights Rehabilitation & Care Center, I would suggest to move them immediately. I lost my grandmother because of this facility.

  • Kelly Nave
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I worked for this facility and I left there crying 3 xs cuz of 2 different co workers and after I told what I saw and when I returned to work them same 2 employees were there working with the same people they were physical and verbal abusing . I do not recommend this place at all

  • A Google User
    ★★★★★ 6 years ago

    Horrible place. Staff don't answer the phone. They don't report health problems to the patient's doctors or family. They don't listen to patients, and they don't provide the health care they're there to give. I so regret that my mother was taken there.

  • Jeff Schatz
    ★★★★★ a week ago

About Mantey Heights Rehabilitation And Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameFive Star Quality Care-Colorado LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 22, 1993 (25 years)
Capacity88
Residents83
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Mantey Heights Rehabilitation And Care Center

Mantey Heights Rehabilitation And Care Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Colorado Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 30, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

February 27, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that residents receive treatments/services to maintain or improve their ability to care for themselves.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Mantey Heights Rehabilitation And Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

85.3%
91.7%
91.7%
91.7%
92.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.6%
74.3%
74.3%
78.1%
89.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
71.4%
75.6%
73.7%
61.8%
48.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
20.0%
20.3%
12.7%
14.0%
17.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
17.0%
6.5%
14.9%
21.0%
17.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.1%
11.6%
13.0%
15.9%
14.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.9%
6.8%
10.9%
8.0%
15.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.8%
2.7%
1.4%
0.0%
9.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.8%
11.6%
10.0%
12.5%
7.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
3.8%
0.0%
0.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
11.1%
13.0%
4.5%
4.8%
4.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.1%
4.3%
1.4%
12.5%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.6%
1.4%
1.4%
1.6%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7%
1.6%
1.1%
4.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.6%
1.4%
1.4%
1.6%
0.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

76.6%
72.2%
75.7%
74.1%
75.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
85.5%
79.7%
79.7%
79.7%
74.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.8%
76.3%
80.5%
81.9%
65.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
8.8%
8.1%
7.1%
8.5%
18.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1%
2.1%
1.8%
0.0%
1.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
2.4%
1.2%
0.0%
1.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016CO
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places